Productivity alters the scale dependence of the diversity-invasibility relationship

被引:84
作者
Davies, Kendi F.
Harrison, Susan
Safford, Hugh D.
Viers, Joshua H.
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Environm Sci & Policy, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] USDA, Forest Serv, Vallejo, CA 94592 USA
关键词
California grassland; coexistence mechanisms; competitive exclusion; diversity-invasibility paradox; heterogeneity; invasion; niche partitioning; productivity; serpentine;
D O I
10.1890/06-1907.1
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
At small scales, areas with high native diversity are often resistant to invasion, while at large scales, areas with more native species harbor more exotic species, suggesting that different processes control the relationship between native and exotic species diversity at different spatial scales. Although the small-scale negative relationship between native and exotic diversity has a satisfactory explanation, we lack a mechanistic explanation for the change in relationship to positive at large scales. We investigated the native-exotic diversity relationship at three scales (range: 1-4000 km(2)) in California serpentine, a system with a wide range in the productivity of sites from harsh to lush. Native and exotic diversity were positively correlated at all three scales; it is rarer to detect a positive relationship at the small scales within which interactions between individuals occur. However, although positively correlated on average, the small-scale relationship between native and exotic diversity was positive at low-productivity sites and negative at high-productivity sites: Thus, the change in the relationship between native and exotic diversity does not depend on spatial scale per se, but occurs whenever environmental conditions change to promote species coexistence rather than competitive exclusion. This occurred within a single spatial scale when the environment shifted from being locally unproductive to productive.
引用
收藏
页码:1940 / 1947
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]  
2
[32]   Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions [J].
Shea, K ;
Chesson, P .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2002, 17 (04) :170-176
[33]   Invasional meltdown 6 years later: important phenomenon, unfortunate metaphor, or both? [J].
Simberloff, Daniel .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2006, 9 (08) :912-919
[34]   Positive interactions of nonindigenous species: Invasional meltdown? [J].
Simberloff D. ;
Von Holle B. .
Biological Invasions, 1999, 1 (1) :21-32
[35]   Dominance not richness determines invasibility of tallgrass prairie [J].
Smith, MD ;
Wilcox, JC ;
Kelly, T ;
Knapp, AK .
OIKOS, 2004, 106 (02) :253-262
[36]   Species diversity and invasion resistance in a marine ecosystem [J].
Stachowicz, JJ ;
Whitlatch, RB ;
Osman, RW .
SCIENCE, 1999, 286 (5444) :1577-1579
[37]  
Stohlgren TJ, 1999, ECOL MONOGR, V69, P25, DOI 10.1890/0012-9615(1999)069[0025:EPSIHS]2.0.CO
[38]  
2
[39]   On the meaning of competition and the mechanisms of competitive superiority [J].
Tilman, D. .
FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 1987, 1 (04) :304-315
[40]  
Tilman D, 1997, ECOLOGY, V78, P81, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[0081:CIRLAG]2.0.CO