An international survey of current practice in the laboratory assessment of anticoagulant therapy with heparin

被引:23
作者
Favaloro, EJ
Bonar, R
Sioufi, J
Wheeler, M
Low, J
Aboud, M
Lloyd, J
Street, A
Marsden, K
机构
[1] Westmead Hosp, Royal Coll Pathologists, Australasia Qual Assurance Program, Inst Clin Pathol & Med Res, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
[2] Westmead Hosp, Dept Haematol, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia
关键词
anticoagulant therapy; heparin; laboratory assessment; survey; haemostasis testing; hemostasis testing; diagnostic practice; quality control;
D O I
10.1080/00313020500098900
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Aims: We conducted a survey of laboratory practice for assessment of heparin anticoagulant therapy by participants of the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Program (RCPA QAP). Methods: A questionnaire was sent to 646 laboratories enrolled in the Haematology component of the QAP, requesting details of tests used for monitoring heparin therapy. Results: Seventy laboratories (10.8%) returned results that indicated that they performed laboratory monitoring of heparin therapy. Most laboratories (69/70=98.6%) use the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) to monitor unfractionated heparin, with eight (11.4%) also using the APTT for monitoring low molecular weight (LMW) heparin. Five (7.1%) laboratories use the thrombin time (TT) test to help monitor heparin therapy and 37 (52.9%) laboratories use an anti-Xa assay to monitor heparin (either LMW or unfractionated). Normal reference ranges (NRR) for APTT differed considerably between laboratories, even those using the same reagent. Therapeutic ranges (TR) also differed considerably between laboratories, for both APTT and the anti-Xa assay. Laboratory differences in NRR and TR using the same reagents could only be partly explained by the use of different instrumentation. Conclusions: There is a large variation in current laboratory practice relating to monitoring of heparin anticoagulant therapy. This finding is similar to that of a similar survey conducted by the RCPA QAP almost a decade ago. This study suggests that better standardisation is still required for laboratory monitoring of heparin therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:234 / 238
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Is laboratory monitoring of low-molecular-weight heparin therapy necessary? No [J].
Bounameaux, H ;
De Moerloose, P .
JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2004, 2 (04) :551-554
[2]  
Connors J J 3rd, 2004, J Vasc Interv Radiol, V15, pS87
[3]   Routine home treatment of deep vein thrombosis - Is now a reality [J].
Eikelboom, J ;
Baker, R .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 322 (7296) :1192-1193
[4]   Heparin pentasaccharide [J].
Gallus, AS ;
Coghlan, DW .
CURRENT OPINION IN HEMATOLOGY, 2002, 9 (05) :422-429
[5]   Is laboratory monitoring of low-molecular-weight heparin therapy necessary? Yes [J].
Harenberg, J .
JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2004, 2 (04) :547-550
[6]   Clinical trials that have influenced the treatment of venous thromboembolism: A historical perspective [J].
Hirsh, J ;
Bates, SM .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 134 (05) :409-417
[7]  
HIRSH J, 2001, ARTERIOSCLER THROMB, V21, P9
[8]  
Ip BKH, 2001, PATHOLOGY, V33, P347
[9]   Problems in laboratory monitoring of heparin dosage [J].
Kitchen, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2000, 111 (02) :397-406
[10]   A survey of heparin monitoring in Australasia [J].
MacKinlay, N ;
Favaloro, E ;
Arthur, C ;
Smith, J ;
Aboud, M .
PATHOLOGY, 1996, 28 (04) :343-347