Risk factors for nuclear, cortical and posterior subcapsular cataracts in the Chinese population of Singapore: the Tanjong Pagar Survey

被引:122
作者
Foster, PJ
Wong, TY
Machin, D
Johnson, GJ
Seah, SKL
机构
[1] UCL, Inst Ophthalmol, Div Epidemiol, London EC1V 9EL, England
[2] Singapore Natl Eye Ctr, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Singapore Eye Res Inst, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Natl Canc Ctr, Div Canc Trials & Epidemiol Studies, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bjo.87.9.1112
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Aim: To describe risk factors for nuclear, cortical, and posterior subcapsular (PSC) cataracts in Chinese Singaporeans. Methods: A population based cross sectional study was carried out on ethnic Chinese men and women aged 40-81 years. A stratified, clustered, disproportionate ( more weights to older people), random sampling procedure was used to initially select 2000 Chinese names of those aged 40-79 years from the 1996 electoral register in the Tanjong Pagar district in Singapore. Eligible subjects (n = 1717) were invited for a standardised ocular examination and interview at a centralised clinic, following which an abbreviated examination was conducted for non-respondents in their homes. Cataract was graded clinically using to the Lens Opacity Classification System (LOCS) III system. The main outcome measures were adjusted odds ratio for risk factors for specific cataract types ( nuclear, cortical and PSC), any cataract and cataract surgery, examined in multiple logistic regression models. Results: Out of the 1232 (71.8%) examined, 1206 (70.2%) provided lens data for this analysis. Increasing age was associated with all cataract types, any cataract, and cataract surgery. There was no significant sex difference in presence of any cataract, specific cataract types or cataract surgery. After controlling for age, sex, and other factors, diabetes was associated with cortical cataract (3.1; 95% CI: 1.6 to 6.1), PSC cataract (2.2; 95% CI 1.2 to 4.1), any cataract (2.0; 95% CI: 0.9 to 4.5), and cataract surgery (2.3; 95% CI: 1.3 to 4.1). Lower body mass index was associated with cortical cataract (1.8; 95% CI: 1.1 to 2.9; lowest versus highest quintile) and any cataract ( 2.3; 95% CI: 1.3 to 4.0). Current cigarette smoking was associated with nuclear cataract (1.7, 95% CI: 1.0 to 2.9; more than 10 cigarettes per day versus none). A non-professional occupation was associated with nuclear cataract (2.9; 95% CI: 1.5 to 5.8; for production or machine operators and 2.6; 95% CI: 1.2 to 5.5; for labourers or agricultural workers, both versus professionals). Lower education was associated with nuclear cataract ( 2.3; 95% CI: 1.0 to 5.2, none versus tertiary), while lower household income was associated with PSC cataract (4.7, 95% CI: 1.1 to 20.0; income < S$2000 versus >S$4000). Conclusions: Age related cataracts are associated with a variety of risk factors among Chinese people in Singapore, similar to those reported in European, Indian, and African derived populations. These data support common aetiological mechanisms for age related cataracts, irrespective of ethnic origin.
引用
收藏
页码:1112 / 1120
页数:9
相关论文
共 66 条
[61]   CIGARETTE-SMOKING AND RISK OF NUCLEAR CATARACTS [J].
WEST, S ;
MUNOZ, B ;
EMMETT, EA ;
TAYLOR, HR .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1989, 107 (08) :1166-1169
[62]   CIGARETTE-SMOKING AND RISK FOR PROGRESSION OF NUCLEAR OPACITIES [J].
WEST, S ;
MUNOZ, B ;
SCHEIN, OD ;
VITALE, S ;
MAGUIRE, M ;
TAYLOR, HR ;
BRESSLER, NM .
ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1995, 113 (11) :1377-1380
[63]  
WEST SK, 1995, SURV OPHTHALMOL, V39, P323
[64]   The prevalence and risk factors for pterygium in an adult Chinese population in Singapore: The Tanjong Pagar Survey [J].
Wong, TY ;
Foster, PJ ;
Johnson, GJ ;
Seah, SKL ;
Tan, DTH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2001, 131 (02) :176-183
[65]  
Wong TY, 2000, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V41, P2486
[66]   Changes in cardiovascular risk factors in different socioeconomic groups: seven year trends in a Chinese urban population [J].
Yu, ZJ ;
Nissinen, A ;
Vartiainen, E ;
Song, GD ;
Guo, ZY ;
Tian, HG .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2000, 54 (09) :692-696