Visualization techniques for multislice CT datasets of coronary arteries: Correlation of axial, multiplanar, three-dimensional, and virtual endoscopic imaging with coronary angiography

被引:27
作者
Herzog, C
Ay, M
Engelmann, K
Abolmaali, N
Dogani, S
Diebold, T
Vogl, TJ
机构
[1] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Inst Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, D-60590 Frankfurt, Germany
[2] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Klin Thorax Herz & Gefasschirurg, D-6000 Frankfurt, Germany
来源
ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN | 2001年 / 173卷 / 04期
关键词
CT angiocardiography; virtual endoscopy; cardiac imaging; multislice CT;
D O I
10.1055/s-2001-12462
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the performance of 4 different visualization techniques for multislice CT datasets from the coronary arteries in comparison to coronary angiography. Material and Methods: 42 patients were examined prospectively using both multislice CT and angiocardiography, All CT scans were performed at collimation 4x1mm, pitch 1.5 and a rotation time of 500 msec. Using retrospective ecg-gating, image reconstruction parameters were 1.25 mm slice thickness, 0.5 mm increment and kernel B30. Each patient's CT dataset subsequently was explored using axial, multiplanar, three-dimensional, and virtual endoscopic Visualization modes. Results: Axial scans showed the highest sensitivity in the evaluation of stenoses (66.7%), followed by virtual endoscopy (55.9%), multiplanar (48.6%), and three-dimensional reformations (33.3%). With regard to the detection of atherosclerotic plaques, axial scans (71.2%), three-dimensional reformations (70.1%), and virtual endoscopy (69.1%) displayed comparable sensitivities, whereas multiplanar reformations showed distinctly lower results (55.6%). On combining the techniques a sensitivity of 74.2% for the detection of atherosclerotic plaques, of 72.0% for the identification of high-grade stenoses, respectively, was obtained. The specificity of all four visualization modes amounted to 97.9% and above. Best results have been obtained within the RIVA (sensitivity 85.2%), Conclusion: For the detection of atheromatous changes CT angiocardiography does not achieve a sensitivity as high as angiocardiography and is restricted to the three major branches. At heart rates below 60 bpm axial scans showed the best correlation in the quantification and classification of atherosclerotic plaques.
引用
收藏
页码:341 / 349
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Achenbach S, 2000, CIRCULATION, V102, P2823
[2]   Comparison of vessel diameters in electron beam tomography and quantitative coronary angiography [J].
Achenbach, S ;
Moshage, W ;
Ropers, D ;
Bachmann, K .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIAC IMAGING, 1998, 14 (01) :1-7
[3]   In-plane coronary arterial motion velocity: Measurement with electron-beam CT [J].
Achenbach, S ;
Ropers, D ;
Holle, J ;
Muschiol, G ;
Daniel, WG ;
Moshage, W .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 216 (02) :457-463
[4]   QUANTIFICATION OF CORONARY-ARTERY CALCIUM USING ULTRAFAST COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY [J].
AGATSTON, AS ;
JANOWITZ, WR ;
HILDNER, FJ ;
ZUSMER, NR ;
VIAMONTE, M ;
DETRANO, R .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1990, 15 (04) :827-832
[5]  
BAHNER ML, 1999, EUR RADIOL, V9, P106
[6]   Comparison of electron beam computed tomography with intracoronary ultrasound and coronary angiography for detection of coronary atherosclerosis [J].
Baumgart, D ;
Schmermund, A ;
Goerge, G ;
Haude, M ;
Ge, JB ;
Adamzik, M ;
Sehnert, C ;
Altmaier, K ;
Groenemeyer, D ;
Seibel, R ;
Erbel, R .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1997, 30 (01) :57-64
[7]  
Becker CR, 2000, RADIOLOGE, V40, P118, DOI 10.1007/s001170050019
[8]   Methods for quantification of coronary artery calcifications with electron beam and conventional computed tomography [J].
Becker, CR ;
Jakobs, T ;
Knez, A ;
Becker, A ;
Haberl, R ;
Brüning, R ;
Schoepf, UJ ;
Reiser, MF .
RADIOLOGE, 1998, 38 (12) :1006-1011
[9]   Detection and quantification of coronary artery calcification with electron-beam and conventional CT [J].
Becker, CR ;
Knez, A ;
Jakobs, TF ;
Aydemir, S ;
Becker, A ;
Schoepf, UJ ;
Bruening, R ;
Haberl, R ;
Reiser, MF .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 1999, 9 (04) :620-624
[10]  
BECKER CR, 1999, ELEKTROMEDICA, V67, P116