High support for nanotechnology in China: A case study in Dalian

被引:9
作者
Zhang, Jing [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Guoyu [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Deming [3 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Univ Technol, Ctr European Union Studies, Dalian 116024, Peoples R China
[2] Dalian Univ Technol, Dept Philosophy, 2 Linggong Rd, Dalian 116024, Peoples R China
[3] Dalian Univ Technol, WISE Lab, Res Ctr S&T Eth & Management, Dalian 116024, Peoples R China
关键词
nanotechnology; public perception; China; PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS; RISK; ATTITUDES; INFORMATION; TECHNOLOGY; TOXICITY; MORALITY; BENEFITS; TRUST;
D O I
10.1093/scipol/scv020
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Public perception of nanotechnology is important as it helps scientists and policy makers understand how the public decides whether or not to support the development of these technologies. To examine the public's perception and attitude toward nanotechnology in China, we conducted a case study in Dalian through a survey in 2013 (N = 741). Support for the technology was indicated by 96.6% of the sample. This sample also had the highest self-reported awareness of nanotechnology worldwide, with 88.4% of the sample reporting having heard of nanotechnology, although they possessed little knowledge about the technology. Support was associated more with beliefs (e.g. expectations for nanotechnology, trust, benefit/risk ratio) than with knowledge. Mass media news reports and advertisements were the top means of communication about nanotechnology. It is very possible that the rate of support for nanotechnology may change in future, as with support for genetically modified food.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 127
页数:13
相关论文
共 44 条
[31]  
Schwitzgebel E., 2014, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
[32]   A Survey on Nanotechnology in the View of the Turkish Public [J].
Senocak, Erdal .
SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2014, 19 (01) :79-94
[33]   Perception of hazards: The role of social trust and knowledge [J].
Siegrist, M ;
Cvetkovich, G .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2000, 20 (05) :713-719
[34]   Laypeople's and experts' perception of nanotechnology hazards [J].
Siegrist, Michael ;
Keller, Carmen ;
Kastenholz, Hans ;
Frey, Silvia ;
Wiek, Arnim .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2007, 27 (01) :59-69
[35]   Affect, risk, and decision making [J].
Slovic, P ;
Peters, E ;
Finucane, ML ;
MacGregor, DG .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 24 (04) :S35-S40
[36]   PERCEPTION OF RISK [J].
SLOVIC, P .
SCIENCE, 1987, 236 (4799) :280-285
[37]  
Slovic P., 2002, HEURISTICS BIASES PS
[38]   Acceptance of nanotechnology in food and food packaging: a path model analysis [J].
Stampfli, Nathalie ;
Siegrist, Michael ;
Kastenholz, Hans .
JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2010, 13 (03) :353-365
[39]   The public understanding of nanotechnology in the food domain: The hidden role of views on science, technology, and nature [J].
Vandermoere, Frederic ;
Blanchemanche, Sandrine ;
Bieberstein, Andrea ;
Marette, Stephan ;
Roosen, Jutta .
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2011, 20 (02) :195-206
[40]   The morality of attitudes toward nanotechnology: about God, techno-scientific progress, and interfering with nature [J].
Vandermoere, Frederic ;
Blanchemanche, Sandrine ;
Bieberstein, Andrea ;
Marette, Stephan ;
Roosen, Jutta .
JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, 2010, 12 (02) :373-381