Identification of chemistry-dependent artifacts on gravimetric PM fine readings at the T1 site during the MILAGRO field campaign

被引:6
作者
Moya, M. [1 ,2 ]
Madronich, S. [3 ]
Retama, A. [4 ]
Weber, R. [5 ]
Baumann, K.
Nenes, A. [5 ]
Castillejos, M. [6 ]
Ponce de Leon, C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Nacl Enfermedades Respiratorias Ismael Cosio, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[2] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[3] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, Boulder, CO 80305 USA
[4] Direcc Monitoreo Atmosfer, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[5] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Earth & Atmospher Sci, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[6] Univ Autonoma Metropolitana Xochimilco, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
MILAGRO; Mexico City; Particulate matter; Air pollution; AEROSOL MASS-SPECTROMETRY; PARTICULATE AIR-POLLUTION; MEXICO-CITY AEROSOL; SAMPLER;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.08.059
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As part of the MIRAGE (MILAGRO) study conducted 7-30 March 2006 in Mexico City and its Metropolitan Area (MCMA), fine particulate matter (PM2.5) was collected using two Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance (TEOM) systems, and a Partisol instrument at the T1 super-site (Tecamac, State of Mexico). Inorganic analysis was performed on filter-based (PM1, PM2.5-URG) measurements also collected at this site. Measurements from the gravimetric (TEOMs, Partisol) and URG systems were inter-compared with chemical speciation measurements using a Particle Into Liquid Sampler (PILS) and Thermal Optical methods. Mass and chemical balances applied over the first part of the study (11-22 March) showed that a TEOM using a device (SES) which reduces particle-bound water and retains a fraction of semi-volatile compounds (SVM) gives readings similar to 30% larger than a conventional TEOM. In the second part of the study (26-30 March), the loss of SVM during TEOM-heated filter collection (both systems) represented a significant fraction of PM2.5 mass due to changes in particle composition. Overall, when nonvolatile nitrate dominated (i.e., when associated with crustal species and not NH4+) and/or sulfate dominates (SO42-/NO3- molar ratio is >1), PM2.5 mass readings are in agreement with those reported for the T1 site if TEOM is using a SES device. However, when volatile nitrate dominates (i.e., NH4NO3) or SO42-/NO3- molar ratio is <1, a larger fraction is lost from both TEOMs (with or without the SES device). Under the latter regime, uncertainties are large and gravimetric losses may reach 30%-50%. The gravimetric PARTISOL instrument recorded lower readings under all of the aforementioned conditions with differences versus TEOMs decreasing with increasing RH. These findings call for a careful characterization of such volatilization biases to improve current PM (PM10. PM2.5) measurements/networks, especially in alkaline-rich environments that can favor such biases. With regards to PM1 and PM2.5 filter-based measurements, findings are: 1) crustal-related elements are important features in the PM2.5-1 size fraction; 2) a factor of similar to 2 overestimation of SO42- concentrations is recorded on substrates during PM collection and 3) main elements of a typical urban aerosol size distribution are concentrated in the 1 mu m (versus 2.5 mu m) size fraction. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:244 / 252
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Mexico City aerosol analysis during MILAGRO using high resolution aerosol mass spectrometry at the urban supersite (T0) - Part 1: Fine particle composition and organic source apportionment
    Aiken, A. C.
    Salcedo, D.
    Cubison, M. J.
    Huffman, J. A.
    DeCarlo, P. F.
    Ulbrich, I. M.
    Docherty, K. S.
    Sueper, D.
    Kimmel, J. R.
    Worsnop, D. R.
    Trimborn, A.
    Northway, M.
    Stone, E. A.
    Schauer, J. J.
    Volkamer, R. M.
    Fortner, E.
    de Foy, B.
    Wang, J.
    Laskin, A.
    Shutthanandan, V.
    Zheng, J.
    Zhang, R.
    Gaffney, J.
    Marley, N. A.
    Paredes-Miranda, G.
    Arnott, W. P.
    Molina, L. T.
    Sosa, G.
    Jimenez, J. L.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2009, 9 (17) : 6633 - 6653
  • [2] Evaluation of the TEOM(R) method for measurement of ambient particulate mass in urban areas
    Allen, G
    Sioutas, C
    Koutrakis, P
    Reiss, R
    Lurmann, FW
    Roberts, PT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 1997, 47 (06) : 682 - 689
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2020, Gothenburg Protocol to reduce transboundary air pollution, DOI DOI 10.5860/CHOICE.44-4512
  • [4] Castillejos M., 2003, REPORTE FINAL PROYEC
  • [5] CEN (European Committee for Standarization), 2003, 264WG15N220 CENTC
  • [6] Chow J.C., 2005, J AIR WASTE MANAGEME, V45, P320
  • [7] Chapter one: exposure measurements
    Chow, JC
    Engelbrecht, JP
    Freeman, NCG
    Hashim, JH
    Jantunen, M
    Michaud, JP
    de Tejada, SS
    Watson, JG
    Wei, FS
    Wilson, WE
    Yasuno, M
    Zhu, T
    [J]. CHEMOSPHERE, 2002, 49 (09) : 873 - 901
  • [8] EVALUATION OF FILTER-BASED AEROSOL MEASUREMENTS DURING THE 1987 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA AIR-QUALITY STUDY
    CHOW, JC
    FUJITA, EM
    WATSON, JG
    LU, ZQ
    LAWSON, DR
    ASBAUGH, LL
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 1994, 30 (01) : 49 - 80
  • [9] Fine particulate air pollution and hospital admission for cardiovascular and respiratory diseases
    Dominici, F
    Peng, RD
    Bell, ML
    Pham, L
    McDermott, A
    Zeger, SL
    Samet, JM
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 295 (10): : 1127 - 1134
  • [10] A MULTIPLE-SYSTEM, MULTICHANNEL DIFFUSION DENUDER SAMPLER FOR THE DETERMINATION OF FINE-PARTICULATE ORGANIC MATERIAL IN THE ATMOSPHERE
    EATOUGH, DJ
    WADSWORTH, A
    EATOUGH, DA
    CRAWFORD, JW
    HANSEN, LD
    LEWIS, EA
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT PART A-GENERAL TOPICS, 1993, 27 (08): : 1213 - 1219