A unique set of 11,008 onion expressed sequence tags reveals expressed sequence and genomic differences between the monocot orders Asparagales and Poales

被引:133
作者
Kuhl, JC
Cheung, F
Yuan, QP
Martin, W
Zewdie, Y
McCallum, J
Catanach, A
Rutherford, P
Sink, KC
Jenderek, M
Prince, JP
Town, CD
Havey, MJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, USDA, ARS, Veg Crops Unit,Dept Hort, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Hort, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[3] Inst Geonom Res, Rockville, MD 20850 USA
[4] Calif State Univ Fresno, Dept Biol, Fresno, CA 93740 USA
[5] Crop & Food Res, Christchurch, New Zealand
[6] Lincoln Univ, Appl Management & Comp Div, Lincoln, New Zealand
[7] USDA, ARS, Natl Arid Land Plant Genet Resources Unit, Parlier, CA 93648 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1105/tpc.017202
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Enormous genomic resources have been developed for plants in the monocot order Poales; however, it is not clear how representative the Poales are for the monocots as a whole. The Asparagales are a monophyletic order sister to the lineage carrying the Poales and possess economically important plants such as asparagus, garlic, and onion. To assess the genomic differences between the Asparagales and Poales, we generated 11,008 unique ESTs from a normalized cDNA library of onion. Sequence analyses of these ESTs revealed microsatellite markers, single nucleotide polymorphisms, and homologs of transposable elements. Mean nucleotide similarity between rice and the Asparagales was 78% across coding regions. Expressed sequence and genomic comparisons revealed strong differences between the Asparagales and Poales for codon usage and mean GC content, GC distribution, and relative GC content at each codon position, indicating that genomic characteristics are not uniform across the monocots. The Asparagales were more similar to eudicots than to the Poales for these genomic characteristics.
引用
收藏
页码:114 / 125
页数:12
相关论文
共 92 条
[81]   Exploiting EST databases for the development and characterization of gene-derived SSR-markers in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) [J].
Thiel, T ;
Michalek, W ;
Varshney, RK ;
Graner, A .
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 2003, 106 (03) :411-422
[82]   CLUSTAL-W - IMPROVING THE SENSITIVITY OF PROGRESSIVE MULTIPLE SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT THROUGH SEQUENCE WEIGHTING, POSITION-SPECIFIC GAP PENALTIES AND WEIGHT MATRIX CHOICE [J].
THOMPSON, JD ;
HIGGINS, DG ;
GIBSON, TJ .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 1994, 22 (22) :4673-4680
[83]   Colinearity and its exceptions in orthologous adh regions of maize and sorghum [J].
Tikhonov, AP ;
SanMiguel, PJ ;
Nakajima, Y ;
Gorenstein, NM ;
Bennetzen, JL ;
Avramova, Z .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1999, 96 (13) :7409-7414
[84]   Deductions about the number, organization, and evolution of genes in the tomato genome based on analysis of a large expressed sequence tag collection and selective genomic sequencing [J].
Van der Hoeven, R ;
Ronning, C ;
Giovannoni, J ;
Martin, G ;
Tanksley, S .
PLANT CELL, 2002, 14 (07) :1441-1456
[85]   A genetic map of an interspecific cross in Allium based on amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP™) markers [J].
van Heusden, AW ;
van Ooijen, JW ;
Vrielink-van Ginkel, R ;
Verbeek, WHJ ;
Wietsma, WA ;
Kik, C .
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 2000, 100 (01) :118-126
[86]  
VEIT B, 1990, GENETICS, V125, P623
[87]   Active retrotransposons are a common feature of grass genomes [J].
Vicient, CM ;
Jääskeläinen, MJ ;
Kalendar, R ;
Schulman, AH .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 125 (03) :1283-1292
[88]  
Wilson ZA., 2000, ARABIDOPSIS PRACTICA
[89]   Compositional gradients in Gramineae genes [J].
Wong, GKS ;
Wang, J ;
Tao, L ;
Tan, J ;
Zhang, JG ;
Passey, DA ;
Yu, J .
GENOME RESEARCH, 2002, 12 (06) :851-856
[90]   A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp indica) [J].
Yu, J ;
Hu, SN ;
Wang, J ;
Wong, GKS ;
Li, SG ;
Liu, B ;
Deng, YJ ;
Dai, L ;
Zhou, Y ;
Zhang, XQ ;
Cao, ML ;
Liu, J ;
Sun, JD ;
Tang, JB ;
Chen, YJ ;
Huang, XB ;
Lin, W ;
Ye, C ;
Tong, W ;
Cong, LJ ;
Geng, JN ;
Han, YJ ;
Li, L ;
Li, W ;
Hu, GQ ;
Huang, XG ;
Li, WJ ;
Li, J ;
Liu, ZW ;
Li, L ;
Liu, JP ;
Qi, QH ;
Liu, JS ;
Li, L ;
Li, T ;
Wang, XG ;
Lu, H ;
Wu, TT ;
Zhu, M ;
Ni, PX ;
Han, H ;
Dong, W ;
Ren, XY ;
Feng, XL ;
Cui, P ;
Li, XR ;
Wang, H ;
Xu, X ;
Zhai, WX ;
Xu, Z .
SCIENCE, 2002, 296 (5565) :79-92