Screening sensitivity and sojourn time from breast cancer early detection clinical trials: Mammograms and physical examinations

被引:100
作者
Shen, Y
Zelen, M
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2001.19.15.3490
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To estimate sensitivities of breast cancer screening modalities and preclinical duration of the disease from eight breast cancer screening clinical trials. Patients and Methods: Screening programs invariably lead to diagnosis of disease before signs or symptoms are present. Two key quantities of screening programs are the sensitivity of the disease detection modality and the mean sojourn time (MST). The observed screening histories in a periodically screened cohort make it possible to estimate these quantities of interest. We applied recently developed statistical methods to data from eight randomized breast cancer screening trials to estimate the sensitivities of early detection modalities and MST. Moreover, when a screening trial involved two screening modalities, our methods enabled the estimation of the individual sensitivity of each screening modality. Results: We analyzed breast cancer data from several screening trials and have relatively complete data from the Health insurance Plan (HIP), Edinburgh, and two Canadian studies. The screening sensitivity for mammography, physical examination, and MST were, respectively, HIP: 0.39, 0.47, and 2.5 years; Edinburgh: 0.63, 0.40, and 4.3 years; Canadian (age 40 to 49 at entry): 0.61, 0.59, and 1.9 years; Canadian (age 50 to 59 at entry): 0.66, 0.39, and 3.1 years. Conclusion: The public debate on early breast cancer detection is mainly centered on mammograms. However, the current study indicates that a physical examination is of comparable importance. Cautious interpretation of trial differences is required as a result of various experimental designs and the age dependency of screening sensitivity and MST.
引用
收藏
页码:3490 / 3499
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条
[31]   THEORY OF PERIODIC SCREENING .1. LEAD TIME AND PROPORTION DETECTED [J].
PROROK, PC .
ADVANCES IN APPLIED PROBABILITY, 1976, 8 (01) :127-143
[32]   THEORY OF PERIODIC SCREENING .2. DOUBLY BOUNDED RECURRENCE TIMES AND MEAN LEAD TIME AND DETECTION PROBABILITY ESTIMATION [J].
PROROK, PC .
ADVANCES IN APPLIED PROBABILITY, 1976, 8 (03) :460-476
[33]  
PROROK PC, 1999, CANC SCREENING THEOR, P29
[34]  
ROBERTS MM, 1990, LANCET, V335, P241
[35]  
Shapiro S, 1979, CONTROL BREAST CANC, P19
[36]   Parametric estimation procedures for screening programmes: Stable and nonstable disease models for multimodality case finding [J].
Shen, Y ;
Zelen, M .
BIOMETRIKA, 1999, 86 (03) :503-515
[37]   DEFICIENCIES IN THE ANALYSIS OF BREAST-CANCER SCREENING DATA [J].
SICKLES, EA ;
KOPANS, DB .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (20) :1621-1624
[38]   WHAT IS THE OPTIMUM INTERVAL BETWEEN MAMMOGRAPHIC SCREENING EXAMINATIONS - AN ANALYSIS BASED ON THE LATEST RESULTS OF THE SWEDISH 2-COUNTY BREAST-CANCER SCREENING TRIAL [J].
TABAR, L ;
FABERBERG, G ;
DAY, NE ;
HOLMBERG, L .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1987, 55 (05) :547-551
[39]  
Tabár L, 1999, CANCER, V86, P449, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990801)86:3<449::AID-CNCR13>3.3.CO
[40]  
2-H