Nonlinearities of near-threshold contrast transduction

被引:34
作者
Kontsevich, LL [1 ]
Tyler, CW [1 ]
机构
[1] Smith Kettlewell Eye Res Inst, San Francisco, CA 94115 USA
关键词
contrast threshold; transducer nonlinearity; contrast discrimination; ON and OFF pathways; pattern masking; uncertainty theory;
D O I
10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00286-7
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The existence of analytic threshold nonlinearities was probed with 2AFC incremental threshold functions for both local and extended test patterns on stationary matched pedestals of the same and opposite sign. In contrast to the facilitation effect with same-sign pedestals, sensitivity with opposite-sign pedestals first deteriorated up to the mask detection level, abruptly improved and then deteriorated again. Analytic solutions for the transducer function with additive noise were derived to account for the incremental data in all conditions. The results for positive difference-of-Gaussian (DoG) stimuli (whose increment made the central spot lighter) and for 10 c deg(-1) Gabor stimuli were consistent with accurate hard-threshold behavior with best-fitting d' powers from 17 to 358. The 10 c deg(-1) data further implied that contrast gain control was operating throughout the subthreshold range. The results for negative DoGs (whose increment corresponds to the darkening of the central spot) and 2 c deg(-1) Gabor profiles were consistent with mild nonlinearities having d' powers of 1.6-3. Significant differences between the nonlinearities for positive and negative DoGs indicate that only a small portion, if any, of the near-threshold nonlinearity could be attributed to uncertainty. Our analysis suggests that, with low spatial frequency gratings, detection was based on those bars that become darker; with high-frequency gratings, on the bars that become brighter. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1869 / 1880
页数:12
相关论文
共 41 条
[21]   WHY LUMINANCE DISCRIMINATION MAY BE BETTER THAN DETECTION [J].
LASLEY, DJ ;
COHN, TE .
VISION RESEARCH, 1981, 21 (02) :273-278
[22]   ON THE ROLE OF X AND SIMPLE CELLS IN HUMAN CONTRAST PROCESSING [J].
LAWTON, TB ;
TYLER, CW .
VISION RESEARCH, 1994, 34 (05) :659-667
[23]   CONTRAST DISCRIMINATION IN NOISE [J].
LEGGE, GE ;
KERSTEN, D ;
BURGESS, AE .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1987, 4 (02) :391-404
[24]   BINOCULAR CONTRAST SUMMATION .2. QUADRATIC SUMMATION [J].
LEGGE, GE .
VISION RESEARCH, 1984, 24 (04) :385-394
[25]   A POWER LAW FOR CONTRAST DISCRIMINATION [J].
LEGGE, GE .
VISION RESEARCH, 1981, 21 (04) :457-467
[26]   ON THE PSYCHOMETRIC FUNCTION FOR CONTRAST DETECTION [J].
NACHMIAS, J .
VISION RESEARCH, 1981, 21 (02) :215-223
[27]   GRATING CONTRAST - DISCRIMINATION MAY BE BETTER THAN DETECTION [J].
NACHMIAS, J ;
SANSBURY, RV .
VISION RESEARCH, 1974, 14 (10) :1039-1042
[28]   VISUAL DETECTION AND DISCRIMINATION OF LUMINANCE INCREMENTS [J].
NACHMIAS, J ;
KOCHER, EC .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1970, 60 (03) :382-&
[29]   MEASUREMENT OF SPATIAL CONTRAST SENSITIVITY WITH THE SWEPT CONTRAST VEP [J].
NORCIA, AM ;
TYLER, CW ;
HAMER, RD ;
WESEMANN, W .
VISION RESEARCH, 1989, 29 (05) :627-637
[30]   UNCERTAINTY EXPLAINS MANY ASPECTS OF VISUAL CONTRAST DETECTION AND DISCRIMINATION [J].
PELLI, DG .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1985, 2 (09) :1508-1532