Penalties, rewards, and inspection: provisions for quality in supply chain contracts

被引:77
作者
Starbird, SA [1 ]
机构
[1] Santa Clara Univ, Leavey Sch Business & Adm, Santa Clara, CA 95053 USA
关键词
quality; contracts; inspection policy; supply chain management;
D O I
10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601048
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Rewards for better quality, penalties for poorer quality, and the type of inspection policy are among the most common quality-related provisions of supply chain contracts. In this paper, we examine the effect of rewards, penalities, and inspection policies on the behaviour of an expected cost minimizing supplier. We assume that the supplier selects a batch size and target quality level in order to meet a buyer's deterministic demand. We show that the reward and/or penalty that motivates a supplier to deliver the buyer's target quality depends upon the inspection policy. We also show that, when sampling inspection is used, penalties and rewards are substitutes for one another in motivating the supplier and that there exists a unique reward/penalty combination at which the buyer's expected cost of quality is zero.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 115
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[11]  
PAGE FH, 1987, J MATH ECON, V16, P157, DOI 10.1016/0304-4068(87)90005-X
[12]   The delivery and control of quality in supplier producer contracts [J].
Reyniers, DJ ;
Tapiero, CS .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1995, 41 (10) :1581-1589
[13]  
SALANIE B, 1998, EC CONTRACTS PRIMER
[14]   ECONOMIC SELECTION OF THE MEAN AND UPPER LIMIT FOR A CANNING PROBLEM WITH LIMITED CAPACITY [J].
SCHMIDT, RL ;
PFEIFER, PE .
JOURNAL OF QUALITY TECHNOLOGY, 1991, 23 (04) :312-317
[15]   THE EFFECT OF ACCEPTANCE SAMPLING AND RISK-AVERSION ON THE QUALITY DELIVERED BY SUPPLIERS [J].
STARBIRD, SA .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 1994, 45 (03) :309-320
[16]  
Starbird SA, 1997, NAV RES LOG, V44, P515, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6750(199709)44:6<515::AID-NAV1>3.0.CO
[17]  
2-6
[18]  
TSAY A, 1998, KLUWER INT SERIES, P299