Gender and computer-mediated communication: group processes in problem solving

被引:41
作者
Adrianson, L [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Psychol, SE-41314 Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
computer-mediated communication; status differences; gender differences; communicative differences; opinion change;
D O I
10.1016/S0747-5632(00)00033-9
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The study reports results from an experiment investigating aspects of communicative processes, using face-to-face (FtF) communication and computer-mediated communication (CMC). The latter was performed in two variants: participants writing under their own names or participants writing anonymously. There were two problems to be solved, both having ambiguous solutions. The theoretical aim was to determine if gender would influence communication equality, social relations, and communicative processes. Furthermore, private and public self-awareness was studied in order to identify differences between the media and between the sexes. The results show that participants discussing FtF were more private self-aware than participants in CMC, and females were more private self-aware than males. Females produced more messages in FtF communication than they did in CMC, and there were also more opinion change from females than from males. Social judgements were more positive from females than from males. A qualitative analysis showed that females expressed more opinions and agreements in FtF communication than in CMC, but also that they agreed more than males in responding to messages from a male. There were also more disagreements in FtF communication than in CMC. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 94
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Group processes in solving two problems: face-to-face and computer-mediated communication [J].
Adrianson, L ;
Hjelmquist, E .
BEHAVIOUR & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 18 (03) :179-198
[2]   USERS EXPERIENCES OF COM - A COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION-SYSTEM [J].
ADRIANSON, L ;
HJELMQUIST, E .
BEHAVIOUR & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 1988, 7 (01) :79-99
[3]   GROUP PROCESSES IN FACE-TO-FACE AND COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION [J].
ADRIANSON, L ;
HJELMQUIST, E .
BEHAVIOUR & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 1991, 10 (04) :281-296
[4]  
ADRIANSON L, 1985, 151 GOT U DEP PSYCH
[5]   GENDER AND COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION [J].
ALLEN, BJ .
SEX ROLES, 1995, 32 (7-8) :557-563
[6]   GENDER DIFFERENCES IN PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION AND ATTRIBUTION OF SUCCESS AND FAILURE [J].
ANDREWS, PH .
HUMAN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 1987, 13 (03) :372-385
[7]   SEX-DIFFERENCES IN GROUP COMMUNICATION - REVIEW OF RELEVANT RESEARCH [J].
BAIRD, JE .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF SPEECH, 1976, 62 (02) :179-192
[8]  
Bales R.F., 1950, INTERACTION PROCESS
[9]  
BERN SL, 1974, J CONSULT CLIN PSYCH, V44, P20
[10]  
Dubrovsk V. J., 1991, Human-Computer Interaction, V6, P119, DOI 10.1207/s15327051hci0602_2