Assessing model predicted vertical cloud structure and cloud overlap with radar and lidar ceilometer observations for the Baltex Bridge Campaign of CLIWA-NET

被引:32
作者
Willén, U
Crewell, S
Baltink, HK
Sievers, O
机构
[1] Swedish Meteorol & Hydrol Inst, S-60176 Norrkoping, Sweden
[2] Univ Bonn, Inst Meteorol, D-5300 Bonn, Germany
[3] Royal Netherlands Meteorol Inst, NL-3730 AE De Bilt, Netherlands
[4] GKSS Forschungszentrum Geesthacht GmbH, Inst Coastal Res, D-2054 Geesthacht, Germany
关键词
cloud vertical structure; overlap; cloud radar;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosres.2004.12.008
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The cloud vertical distribution and overlap of four large-scale models operating at different horizontal and vertical resolutions have been assessed using radar and lidar observations from the Baltex Bridge Campaign of CLIWA-NET. The models range from the global European Centre for Medium range Weather Forecast (ECMWF) model, to the Regional Atmospheric Climate Model (RACMO) and the Rossby Centre Atmospheric (RCA) regional climate model, to the non-hydrostatic meso-scale Lokal Model (LM). Different time averaging periods for the radar data were used to estimate the uncertainty of the point-to-space transformations of the observations. Relative to the observations, all models underestimated the height of the lowest cloud base. Clouds occurred more frequently in the models but with smaller cloud fractions below 7 km. The findings confirm previous cloud radar studies which found that models overestimate cloud fractions above 7 km. Radar-observed clouds were often thinner than the model vertical resolutions, which can have serious implications on model cloud overlap and radiation fluxes. The radar-derived cloud overlap matrix, which takes into account the overlap of all vertical layers, was found to be close to maximum-random overlap. Using random overlap for vertically continuous clouds with vertical gradients in cloud fraction larger than 40-50% per kilometre gave the best fit to the data. The gradient approach could be improved by making it resolution- and cloud system-dependent. Previous cloud radar overlap studies have considered the overlap of two cloud layers as a function of maximum and random overlap. Here, it was found that the two-layer overlap could be modelled by a mixture of maximum and minimum overlap. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 255
页数:29
相关论文
共 34 条
[21]  
MANABE S, 1964, J ATMOS SCI, V21, P361, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1964)021<0361:TEOTAW>2.0.CO
[22]  
2
[23]   Boundaries and internal structure of mixed phase clouds as deduced from ground-based 95-GHz radar and airborne lidar measurements [J].
Quante, M ;
Lemke, H ;
Flentje, H ;
Francis, P ;
Pelon, J .
PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF THE EARTH PART B-HYDROLOGY OCEANS AND ATMOSPHERE, 2000, 25 (10-12) :889-895
[24]   Evaluation and optimization of sampling errors for the Monte Carlo Independent Column Approximation [J].
Räisänen, P ;
Barker, HW .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2004, 130 (601) :2069-2085
[25]   Breaking the cloud parameterization deadlock [J].
Randall, D ;
Khairoutdinov, M ;
Arakawa, A ;
Grabowski, W .
BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2003, 84 (11) :1547-1564
[26]   CLOUD OVERLAP STATISTICS [J].
TIAN, L ;
CURRY, JA .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1989, 94 (D7) :9925-9935
[27]  
TIEDTKE M, 1993, MON WEATHER REV, V121, P3040, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1993)121<3040:ROCILS>2.0.CO
[28]  
2
[29]   Comparison of model predicted liquid water path with ground-based measurements during CLIWA-NET [J].
van Meijgaard, E ;
Crewell, S .
ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2005, 75 (03) :201-226
[30]   Comparison of model predicted cloud parameters and surface radiative fluxes with observations on the 100 km scale [J].
van Meijgaard, E ;
Andræ, U ;
Rockel, B .
METEOROLOGY AND ATMOSPHERIC PHYSICS, 2001, 77 (1-4) :109-130