Diabetes Control With Reciprocal Peer Support Versus Nurse Care Management A Randomized Trial

被引:272
作者
Heisler, Michele [1 ]
Vijan, Sandeep
Makki, Fatima
Piette, John D.
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Vet Affairs Ann Arbor Hlth Syst, Ann Arbor, MI 48113 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
SELF-MANAGEMENT; INSULIN THERAPY; SOCIAL SUPPORT; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; CHRONIC ILLNESS; INTERVENTIONS; HEALTH; EDUCATION; DISEASE; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-153-8-201010190-00007
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Resource barriers complicate diabetes care management. Support from peers may help patients manage their diabetes. Objective: To compare a reciprocal peer-support (RPS) program with nurse care management (NCM). Design: Randomized, controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00320112) Setting: 2 U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs health care facilities. Patients: 244 men with hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) levels greater than 7.5% during the previous 6 months. Measurements: The primary outcome was 6-month change in HbA(1c) level. Secondary outcomes were changes in insulin therapy; blood pressure; and patient reports of medication adherence, diabetes-related support, and emotional distress. Intervention: Patients in the RPS group attended an initial group session to set diabetes-related behavioral goals, receive peer communication skills training, and be paired with another age-matched peer patient. Peers were encouraged to talk weekly using a telephone platform that recorded call occurrence and provided reminders to promote peer contact. These patients could also participate in optional group sessions at 1, 3, and 6 months. Patients in the NCM group attended a 1.5-hour educational session and were assigned to a nurse care manager. Results: Of the 244 patients enrolled, 216 (89%) completed the HbA(1c) assessments and 231 (95%) completed the survey assessments at 6 months. Mean HbA(1c) level decreased from 8.02% to 7.73% (change, -0.29%) in the RPS group and increased from 7.93% to 8.22% (change, 0.29%) in the NCM group. The difference in HbA(1c) change between groups was 0.58% (P = 0.004). Among patients with a baseline HbA(1c) level greater than 8.0%, those in the RPS group had a mean decrease of 0.88%, compared with a 0.07% decrease among those in the NCM group (between-group difference, 0.81%; P < 0.001). Eight patients in the RPS group started insulin therapy, compared with 1 patient in the NCM group (P = 0.020). Groups did not differ in blood pressure, self-reported medication adherence, or diabetes-specific distress, but the RPS group reported improvement in diabetes social support. Limitation: The study included only male veterans and lasted only 6 months. Conclusion: Reciprocal peer support holds promise as a method for diabetes care management.
引用
收藏
页码:507 / 515
页数:9
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
*AM COLL PHYS, 2010, PAT CTR MED HOM
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Design and Analysis of Group-Randomized Trials
[3]   Evaluation of diagnostic reliability of DCA 2000 for rapid and simple monitoring of HbA1c [J].
Arsie, MP ;
Marchioro, L ;
Lapolla, A ;
Giacchetto, GF ;
Bordin, MR ;
Rizzotti, P ;
Fedele, D .
ACTA DIABETOLOGICA, 2000, 37 (01) :1-7
[4]  
Bandura A., 1986, SOCIAL FDN THOUGHT A
[5]   Do Internet-based support interventions change perceptions of social support? An experimental trial of approaches for supporting diabetes self-management [J].
Barrera, M ;
Glasgow, RE ;
McKay, HG ;
Boles, SM ;
Feil, EG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 30 (05) :637-654
[6]   Goal-setting for behavior change in primary care: An exploration and status report [J].
Bodenheimer, Thomas ;
Handley, Margaret A. .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2009, 76 (02) :174-180
[7]   Providing social support may be more beneficial than receiving it: Results from a prospective study of mortality [J].
Brown, SL ;
Nesse, RM ;
Vinokur, AD ;
Smith, DM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2003, 14 (04) :320-327
[8]   CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials [J].
Campbell, MK ;
Elbourne, DR ;
Altman, DG .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7441) :702-708
[9]   Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure [J].
Chobanian, AV ;
Bakris, GL ;
Black, HR ;
Cushman, WC ;
Green, LA ;
Izzo, JL ;
Jones, DW ;
Materson, BJ ;
Oparil, S ;
Wright, JT ;
Roccella, EJ .
HYPERTENSION, 2003, 42 (06) :1206-1252
[10]   Group visits: Promoting adherence to diabetes guidelines [J].
Clancy, Dawn E. ;
Huang, Peng ;
Okonofua, Eni ;
Yeager, Derik ;
Magruder, Kathryn Marley .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2007, 22 (05) :620-624