Tumor detection by diffusion-weighted MRI and ADC-Mapping - Initial clinical experiences in comparison to PET-CT

被引:104
作者
Lichy, Matthias P.
Aschoff, Philip
Plathow, Christian
Stemmer, Alto
Horger, Wilhelm
Mueller-Horvat, Christian
Steidle, Gunter
Horger, Marius
Schafer, Jurgen
Eschmann, Susanne M.
Kiefer, Berthold
Claussen, Claus D.
Pfannenberg, Christina
Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
机构
[1] Univ Tubingen, Univ Klinikum, Dept Diagnost Radiol, D-72072 Tubingen, Germany
[2] Siemens Med Solut, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Erlangen, Germany
[3] Siemens Med Solut, Dept Nucl Med, Erlangen, Germany
[4] Siemens Med Solut, MED MREA, Erlangen, Germany
关键词
diffusion-weighted imaging; ADC; tumor staging; PET-CT;
D O I
10.1097/RLI.0b013e31804ffd49
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the clinical potential of diffusion-weighted-imaging (DWI) with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)-mapping for tumor detection. Materials and Methods: A single-shot echo-planar-imaging DWI sequence with fat suppression and ability for navigator-based respiratory triggering was implemented. Nineteen patients (I I melanoma, 4 prostate cancer, 1 non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and 3 lung cancer) were examined by positron emission tomography (PET) with an integrated computed tomography scanner (PETCT) and DWI. Images at b = 0, 400, and 1000 S/mm(2) were acquired and ADC maps were generated. PET examinations were used as a reference for tumor detection. Four hundred twenty-four regions of interest were used for DWI and 73 for PET data evaluation. Results: DWI and ADC maps were of diagnostic quality. Metastases with increased tracer uptake were clearly visualized at b = 1000 s/mm(2) with the exception of mediastinal lymph node metastases in cases of lung cancer. ADC mapping did not improve detection rates. Conclusions: DWI is a feasible clinical technique, improving the assessment of metastatic spread in routine magnetic resonance imaging examinations.
引用
收藏
页码:605 / 613
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Brechtel K, 2006, J NUCL MED, V47, P470
[2]   In vivo uptake of [11C]choline does not correlate with cell proliferation in human prostate cancer [J].
Breeuwsma, AJ ;
Pruim, J ;
Jongen, MM ;
Suurmeijer, AJ ;
Vaalburg, W ;
Nijman, RJ ;
de Jong, IJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2005, 32 (06) :668-673
[3]   Multishot diffusion-weighted PROPELLER magnetic resonance imaging of the abdomen [J].
Deng, Jie ;
Miller, Frank H. ;
Salem, Riad ;
Omary, Reed A. ;
Larson, Andrew C. .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2006, 41 (10) :769-775
[4]   A comparative evaluation of a RARE-based single-shot pulse sequence for diffusion-weighted MRI of musculoskeletal soft-tissue tumors [J].
Dietrich, O ;
Raya, JG ;
Sommer, J ;
Deimling, M ;
Reiser, MF ;
Baur-Melnyk, A .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2005, 15 (04) :772-783
[5]   Diffusion-weighted MRI of soft tissue tumours [J].
Einarsdóttir, H ;
Karlsson, M ;
Wejde, J ;
Bauer, HCF .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2004, 14 (06) :959-963
[6]   Detection of recurrence in patients with rectal cancer: PET/CT after abdominoperineal or anterior resection [J].
Even-Sapir, E ;
Parag, Y ;
Lerman, H ;
Gutman, M ;
Levine, C ;
Rabau, M ;
Figer, A ;
Metser, U .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 232 (03) :815-822
[7]   Diffusion-weighted imaging of brain metastases:: their potential to be misinterpreted as focal ischaemic lesions [J].
Geijer, B ;
Holtås, S .
NEURORADIOLOGY, 2002, 44 (07) :568-573
[8]   Comparison of quantitative T2 mapping and diflusion-weighted imaging in the normal and pathologic prostate [J].
Gibbs, P ;
Tozer, DJ ;
Liney, GP ;
Turnbull, LW .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2001, 46 (06) :1054-1058
[9]   Diffusion weighted imaging of bone marrow pathologies [J].
Herneth, AM ;
Friedrich, K ;
Weidekamm, C ;
Schibany, N ;
Krestan, C ;
Czerny, C ;
Kainberger, F .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2005, 55 (01) :74-83
[10]   Early response of prostate carcinoma xenografts to docetaxel chemotherapy monitored with diffusion MRI [J].
Jennings, D ;
Hatton, BN ;
Guo, JY ;
Galons, JP ;
Trouard, TP ;
Raghunand, N ;
Marshall, J ;
Gillies, RJ .
NEOPLASIA, 2002, 4 (03) :255-262