Resuscitation preferences among patients with severe congestive heart failure - Results from the SUPPORT project

被引:166
作者
Krumholz, HM
Phillips, RS
Hamel, MB
Teno, JM
Bellamy, P
Broste, SK
Califf, RM
Vidaillet, H
Davis, RB
Muhlbaier, LH
Connors, AF
LYnn, J
Goldman, L
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Sect Cardiovasc Med, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Sect Chron Dis Epidemiol, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[3] Yale New Haven Hosp, Ctr Outcomes Res & Evaluat, New Haven, CT 06504 USA
[4] Beth Israel Hosp, Div Gen Med & Primary Care, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[5] Brown Univ, Ctr Gerontol & Hlth Care Res, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[6] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Med Ctr, Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[7] Marshfield Med Res Fdn, Marshfield Clin, Marshfield, WI 54449 USA
[8] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[9] Case Western Reserve Univ, Metrohlth Med Ctr, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[10] George Washington Univ, Med Ctr, Washington, DC 20037 USA
[11] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med, San Francisco, CA USA
关键词
resuscitation; patients; heart failure;
D O I
10.1161/01.CIR.98.7.648
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background-We sought to describe the resuscitation preferences of patients hospitalized with an exacerbation of severe congestive heart failure, perceptions of those preferences by their physicians, and the stability of the preferences. Methods and Results-Of 936 patients in this study, 215 (23%) explicitly stated that they did not want to be resuscitated. Significant correlates of not wanting to be resuscitated included older age, perception of a worse prognosis, poorer functional status, and higher income. The physician's perception of the patient's Preference disagreed with the patient's actual preference in 24% of the cases overall. Only 25% of the patients reported discussing resuscitation preferences with their physician, but discussion of preferences was not significantly associated with higher agreement between the patient and physician. Of the 600 patients who responded to the resuscitation question again 2 months later, 19% had changed their preferences, including 14% of those who initially wanted resuscitation (69 of 480) and 40% of those who initially did not (48 of 120). The physician's perception of the patient's hospital resuscitation preference was correct for 84% of patients who had a stable preference and 68% of those who did not. Conclusions-Almost one quarter of patients hospitalized with severe heart failure expressed a preference not to be resuscitated. The physician's perception of the patient's preference was not accurate in about one quarter of the cases, but communication was not associated with greater agreement between the patient and the physician, A substantial proportion of patients who did not want to be resuscitated changed their minds within 2 months of discharge.
引用
收藏
页码:648 / 655
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   DO-NOT-RESUSCITATE ORDERS FOR CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS IN THE HOSPITAL - HOW ARE THEY USED AND WHAT IS THEIR IMPACT [J].
BEDELL, SE ;
PELLE, D ;
MAHER, PL ;
CLEARY, PD .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1986, 256 (02) :233-237
[2]   PATIENTS AND FAMILIES PREFERENCES FOR MEDICAL INTENSIVE-CARE [J].
DANIS, M ;
PATRICK, DL ;
SOUTHERLAND, LI ;
GREEN, ML .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1988, 260 (06) :797-802
[3]   ATTITUDES OF HOSPITALIZED-PATIENTS TOWARD LIFE SUPPORT - A SURVEY OF 200 MEDICAL INPATIENTS [J].
FRANKL, D ;
OYE, RK ;
BELLAMY, PE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1989, 86 (06) :645-648
[4]   COMPARATIVE REPRODUCIBILITY AND VALIDITY OF SYSTEMS FOR ASSESSING CARDIOVASCULAR FUNCTIONAL CLASS - ADVANTAGES OF A NEW SPECIFIC ACTIVITY SCALE [J].
GOLDMAN, L ;
HASHIMOTO, B ;
COOK, EF ;
LOSCALZO, A .
CIRCULATION, 1981, 64 (06) :1227-1234
[5]   FAILED COMMUNICATION ABOUT LIFE-SUPPORT THERAPY - SILENT PHYSICIANS AND MUTE PATIENTS [J].
KINSELLA, TD ;
STOCKING, CB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1989, 86 (06) :643-644
[6]   A CONTROLLED TRIAL TO IMPROVE CARE FOR SERIOUSLY ILL HOSPITALIZED-PATIENTS - THE STUDY TO UNDERSTAND PROGNOSES AND PREFERENCES FOR OUTCOMES AND RISKS OF TREATMENTS (SUPPORT) [J].
KNAUS, WA ;
CONNORS, AF ;
DAWSON, NV ;
DESBIENS, NA ;
FULKERSON, WJ ;
GOLDMAN, L ;
LYNN, J ;
OYE, RK ;
BERGNER, M ;
DAMIANO, A ;
HAKIM, R ;
MURPHY, DJ ;
TENO, J ;
VIRNIG, B ;
WAGNER, DP ;
WU, AW ;
YASUI, Y ;
ROBINSON, DK ;
KRELING, B ;
DULAC, J ;
BAKER, R ;
HOLAYEL, S ;
MEEKS, T ;
MUSTAFA, M ;
VEGARRA, J ;
ALZOLA, C ;
HARRELL, FE ;
COOK, EF ;
HAMEL, MB ;
PETERSON, L ;
PHILLIPS, RS ;
TSEVAT, J ;
FORROW, L ;
LESKY, L ;
DAVIS, R ;
KRESSIN, N ;
SOLZAN, J ;
PUOPOLO, AL ;
BARRETT, LQ ;
BUCKO, N ;
BROWN, D ;
BURNS, M ;
FOSKETT, C ;
HOZID, A ;
KEOHANE, C ;
MARTINEZ, C ;
MCWEENEY, D ;
MELIA, D ;
OTTO, S ;
SHEEHAN, K .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 274 (20) :1591-1598
[7]   THE SUPPORT PROGNOSTIC MODEL - OBJECTIVE ESTIMATES OF SURVIVAL FOR SERIOUSLY ILL HOSPITALIZED ADULTS [J].
KNAUS, WA ;
HARRELL, FE ;
LYNN, J ;
GOLDMAN, L ;
PHILLIPS, RS ;
CONNERS, AF ;
DAWSON, NV ;
FULKERSON, WJ ;
CALIFF, RM ;
DESBIENS, N ;
LAYDE, P ;
OYE, RK ;
BELLAMY, PE ;
HAKIM, RB ;
WAGNER, DP .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1995, 122 (03) :191-203
[8]   THE APACHE-III PROGNOSTIC SYSTEM - RISK PREDICTION OF HOSPITAL MORTALITY FOR CRITICALLY ILL HOSPITALIZED ADULTS [J].
KNAUS, WA ;
WAGNER, DP ;
DRAPER, EA ;
ZIMMERMAN, JE ;
BERGNER, M ;
BASTOS, PG ;
SIRIO, CA ;
MURPHY, DJ ;
LOTRING, T ;
DAMIANO, A ;
HARRELL, FE .
CHEST, 1991, 100 (06) :1619-1636
[9]   PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS IN SUPPORT - FUNCTIONAL STATUS [J].
LANDEFELD, CS ;
PHILLIPS, RS ;
BERGNER, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1990, 43 :S37-S39
[10]   MEASUREMENT OF OBSERVER AGREEMENT FOR CATEGORICAL DATA [J].
LANDIS, JR ;
KOCH, GG .
BIOMETRICS, 1977, 33 (01) :159-174