Influence of re-exposure and retrieval disruption during group collaboration on later individual recall

被引:110
作者
Blumen, Helena M. [1 ]
Rajaram, Suparna [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Psychol, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/09658210701804495
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This research examined the influence of prior group collaboration on later individual recall. We considered the negative effects of retrieval disruption and the potentially positive effects of re-exposure to additional items during group recall in the context of three hypotheses: the individual-strategy hypothesis, the combined-strategy hypothesis, and the group-strategy hypothesis. After a study phase and a brief delay, participants completed three successive recall trials in four different recall sequence conditions: III (individual-individual-individual), ICI (individual-collaborative-individual), CII (collaborative-individual-individual), and CCI (collaborative-collaborative-individual). Results show that repeated group recalls (CCI), and securing individual retrieval organisation prior to group recall (ICI), benefit later individual recall more than repeated individual recalls (III). These findings support the group-strategy hypothesis and the individual-strategy hypothesis, and have important implications for group versus individual learning practices in educational settings.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 244
页数:14
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Cued memory collaboration: Effects of friendship and type of retrieval cue [J].
Andersson, J ;
Ronnberg, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 9 (03) :273-287
[2]   RECALL SUFFERS FROM COLLABORATION - JOINT RECALL EFFECTS OF FRIENDSHIP AND TASK COMPLEXITY [J].
ANDERSSON, J ;
RONNBERG, J .
APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 9 (03) :199-211
[3]   Effects of the timing and identity of retrieval cues in individual recall: An attempt to mimic cross-cueing in collaborative recall [J].
Andersson, J ;
Hitch, G .
MEMORY, 2006, 14 (01) :94-103
[4]  
Andersson J, 1996, APPL COGNITIVE PSYCH, V10, P171, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199604)10:2<171::AID-ACP385>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-D
[6]   A comparison of group and individual remembering: Does collaboration disrupt retrieval strategies? [J].
Basden, BH ;
Basden, DR ;
Bryner, S ;
Thomas, RL .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1997, 23 (05) :1176-1191
[7]  
Basden BH, 2000, APPL COGNITIVE PSYCH, V14, P497, DOI 10.1002/1099-0720(200011/12)14:6<497::AID-ACP665>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-4
[9]   EFFECT OF CUEING WITH LIST MEMBERS IN FREE-RECALL AS A FUNCTION OF NUMBER OF CATEGORIES, TAXONOMIC FREQUENCY, AND PRESENTATION ORDER [J].
BASDEN, DR ;
DRAPER, JS .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE, 1973, 27 (03) :327-333
[10]   INHIBITION WITH PART-LIST CUING - SOME TESTS OF ITEM STRENGTH HYPOTHESIS [J].
BASDEN, DR ;
BASDEN, BH ;
GALLOWAY, BC .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN LEARNING AND MEMORY, 1977, 3 (01) :100-108