Is severe right ventricular failure in left ventricular assist device recipients a risk factor for unsuccessful bridging to transplant and post-transplant mortality

被引:133
作者
Morgan, JA [1 ]
John, R [1 ]
Lee, BJ [1 ]
Oz, MC [1 ]
Naka, Y [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Coll Phys & Surg, Dept Surg, Div Cardiothorac Surg, New York, NY USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.09.048
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Bridging to transplant with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) can be limited by severe right ventricular failure (RVF). The focus of this study was to ascertain whether early implantation (< 24 hours) of a right ventricular assist device (RVAD) in patients with severe RVF improved survival and whether severe RVF adversely affected post-transplant survival. Methods. We conducted a 10-year review of our bridge to transplant experience using the Heartmate device (Thoratec, Pleasanton, CA, USA), studying patients who required an Abiomed RVAD (Abiomed, Danvers, MA, USA). Results. There were 243 patients who underwent LVAD implantation, of which 17 (7.0%) required an RVAD. Ten patients underwent early RVAD insertion (< 24 hours) while 7 underwent delayed insertion (> 24 hours). Bridging to transplant was successful in 11 (64.7%) RVAD patients versus 163 (72.1%) non-RVAD patients (p = 0.046). Of the 10 patients who underwent early RVAD insertion, 7 (70.0%) were successfully bridged. Of the 7 patients who underwent delayed RVAD insertion, 4 (57.1%) were successfully bridged (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in post-transplant 1, 5, and 10-year survival between RVAD and non-RVAD patients (71.4%, 71.4%, and 71.4% for RVAD patients, vs 90.5%, 80.4%, and 78.5%, respectively, for non-RVAD patients; p = 0.366). Pretransplant RVAD support was not a risk factor for post-transplant mortality (p = 0.864). Conclusions. Severe RVF adversely impacted bridging to transplant, although survival was improved with early RVAD insertion. The trend toward worse post-transplant survival in the RVAD cohort raises the possibility that if additional patients were evaluated, a difference in survival might be observed, suggesting the need for a multicenter analysis. (C) 2004 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.
引用
收藏
页码:859 / 863
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Experience with right ventricular assist devices for perioperative right sided circulatory failure [J].
Chen, JM ;
Levin, HR ;
Rose, EA ;
Addonizio, LJ ;
Landry, DW ;
Sistino, JJ ;
Michler, RE ;
Oz, MC .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1996, 61 (01) :305-310
[2]   RIGHT HEART INTERACTION WITH THE MECHANICALLY ASSISTED LEFT HEART [J].
FARRAR, DJ ;
COMPTON, PG ;
HERSHON, JJ ;
FONGER, JD ;
HILL, JD .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1985, 9 (01) :89-102
[3]   Preoperative and postoperative comparison of patients with univentricular and biventricular support with the Thoratec ventricular assist device as a bridge to cardiac transplantation [J].
Farrar, DJ ;
Hill, JD ;
Pennington, DG ;
McBride, LR ;
Holman, WL ;
Kormos, RL ;
Esmore, D ;
Gray, LA ;
Seifert, PE ;
Schoettle, GP ;
Moore, CH ;
Hendry, PJ ;
Bhayana, JN .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1997, 113 (01) :202-209
[4]   Preoperative risk factors for right ventricular failure after implantable left ventricular assist device insertion [J].
Fukamachi, K ;
McCarthy, PM ;
Smedira, NG ;
Vargo, RL ;
Starling, RC ;
Young, JB .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1999, 68 (06) :2181-2184
[5]   Right ventricular dysfunction and organ failure in left ventricular assist device recipients: A continuing problem [J].
Kavarana, MN ;
Pessin-Minsley, MS ;
Urtecho, J ;
Catanese, KA ;
Flannery, M ;
Oz, MC ;
Naka, Y .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2002, 73 (03) :745-750
[6]   Transplant candidate's clinical status rather than right ventricular function defines need for univentricular versus biventricular support [J].
Kormos, RL ;
Gasior, TA ;
Kawai, A ;
Pham, SM ;
Murali, S ;
Hattler, BG ;
Griffith, BP .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1996, 111 (04) :773-783
[7]   HEMODYNAMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL-CHANGES DURING SUPPORT WITH AN IMPLANTABLE LEFT-VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE [J].
MCCARTHY, PM ;
SAVAGE, RM ;
FRASER, CD ;
VARGO, R ;
JAMES, KB ;
GOORMASTIC, M ;
HOBBS, RE .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1995, 109 (03) :409-418
[8]   Six-year experience of caring for forty-four patients with a left ventricular assist device at home: Safe, economical, necessary [J].
Morales, DLS ;
Catanese, KA ;
Helman, DN ;
Williams, MR ;
Weinberg, A ;
Goldstein, DJ ;
Rose, EA ;
Oz, MC .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2000, 119 (02) :251-258
[9]   Does bridging to transplantation with a left ventricular assist device adversely affect posttransplantation survival? A comparative analysis of mechanical versus inotropic support [J].
Morgan, JA ;
Park, Y ;
Kherani, AR ;
Vigilance, DW ;
Cheema, FH ;
Oz, MC ;
Naka, Y .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2003, 126 (04) :1188-1190
[10]  
MORGAN JA, IN PRESS J THORAC CA