The combined effects of risk and time on choice: Does uncertainty eliminate the immediacy effect? Does delay eliminate the certainty effect?

被引:100
作者
Weber, BJ [1 ]
Chapman, GB [1 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Psychol, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
risk; time; choice; indifference points; allais paradox; certainty effect; common ratio effect; immediacy effect; delay; preference reversals; joint evaluation;
D O I
10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.01.001
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Researchers have noted parallels between decisions under uncertainty and over time. Three experiments evaluated the theory that uncertainty and time affect choice via a common underlying dimension, such that delaying an outcome is equivalent to making it uncertain. To test this account we asked whether adding uncertainty to outcomes would eliminate the immediacy effect bias. We also asked whether adding time delay to outcomes would eliminate the certainty effect bias. The answer to both questions was yes, provided the prospects were presented singly rather than jointly. In single evaluation uncertainly eliminated the immediacy effect and delay eliminated one form of the certainty effect, while in joint evaluation, these effects did not occur. These findings suggest that at least in some contexts decision makers may equate risk and delay. Other explanations are possible, however, demonstrating that the interaction between risk and delay is complex and not easily understood. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:104 / 118
页数:15
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   An empirical study on intertemporal decision making under risk [J].
Ahlbrecht, M ;
Weber, M .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1997, 43 (06) :813-826
[2]   SPECIOUS REWARD - BEHAVIORAL THEORY OF IMPULSIVENESS AND IMPULSE CONTROL [J].
AINSLIE, G .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1975, 82 (04) :463-496
[4]   THE EFFECT ON THE PREFERENCE-REVERSAL PHENOMENON OF USING CHOICE INDIFFERENCES [J].
BOSTIC, R ;
HERRNSTEIN, RJ ;
LUCE, RD .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1990, 13 (02) :193-212
[5]   The evaluability hypothesis: An explanation for preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of alternatives [J].
Hsee, CK .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1996, 67 (03) :247-257
[6]   CHOICES, VALUES, AND FRAMES [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
TVERSKY, A .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1984, 39 (04) :341-350
[7]   PROSPECT THEORY - ANALYSIS OF DECISION UNDER RISK [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
TVERSKY, A .
ECONOMETRICA, 1979, 47 (02) :263-291
[8]   IMMEDIACY AND CERTAINTY IN INTERTEMPORAL CHOICE [J].
KEREN, G ;
ROELOFSMA, P .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1995, 63 (03) :287-297
[9]   MODELING MYOPIC DECISIONS - EVIDENCE FOR HYPERBOLIC DELAY-DISCOUNTING WITHIN-SUBJECTS AND AMOUNTS [J].
KIRBY, KN ;
MARAKOVIC, NN .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1995, 64 (01) :22-30
[10]   PREFERENCE REVERSALS DUE TO MYOPIC DISCOUNTING OF DELAYED REWARD [J].
KIRBY, KN ;
HERRNSTEIN, RJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1995, 6 (02) :83-89