The combined effects of risk and time on choice: Does uncertainty eliminate the immediacy effect? Does delay eliminate the certainty effect?

被引:100
作者
Weber, BJ [1 ]
Chapman, GB [1 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Psychol, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
risk; time; choice; indifference points; allais paradox; certainty effect; common ratio effect; immediacy effect; delay; preference reversals; joint evaluation;
D O I
10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.01.001
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Researchers have noted parallels between decisions under uncertainty and over time. Three experiments evaluated the theory that uncertainty and time affect choice via a common underlying dimension, such that delaying an outcome is equivalent to making it uncertain. To test this account we asked whether adding uncertainty to outcomes would eliminate the immediacy effect bias. We also asked whether adding time delay to outcomes would eliminate the certainty effect bias. The answer to both questions was yes, provided the prospects were presented singly rather than jointly. In single evaluation uncertainly eliminated the immediacy effect and delay eliminated one form of the certainty effect, while in joint evaluation, these effects did not occur. These findings suggest that at least in some contexts decision makers may equate risk and delay. Other explanations are possible, however, demonstrating that the interaction between risk and delay is complex and not easily understood. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:104 / 118
页数:15
相关论文
共 18 条
[11]   REVERSALS OF PREFERENCE BETWEEN BIDS AND CHOICES IN GAMBLING DECISIONS [J].
LICHTENSTEIN, S ;
SLOVIC, P .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1971, 89 (01) :46-+
[12]   ANOMALIES IN INTERTEMPORAL CHOICE - EVIDENCE AND AN INTERPRETATION [J].
LOEWENSTEIN, G ;
PRELEC, D .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1992, 107 (02) :573-597
[13]   COGNITION AND BEHAVIOR IN STUDIES OF CHOICE [J].
RACHLIN, H ;
LOGUE, AW ;
GIBBON, J ;
FRANKEL, M .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1986, 93 (01) :33-45
[14]   SUBJECTIVE-PROBABILITY AND DELAY [J].
RACHLIN, H ;
RAINERI, A ;
CROSS, D .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1991, 55 (02) :233-244
[15]   ADVANCES IN PROSPECT-THEORY - CUMULATIVE REPRESENTATION OF UNCERTAINTY [J].
TVERSKY, A ;
KAHNEMAN, D .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 1992, 5 (04) :297-323
[16]  
TVERSKY A, 1990, AM ECON REV, V80, P204
[17]   CONTINGENT WEIGHTING IN JUDGMENT AND CHOICE [J].
TVERSKY, A ;
SATTATH, S ;
SLOVIC, P .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1988, 95 (03) :371-384
[18]  
WEBER BJ, 2003, NOV 2003 M SOC JUDG