Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: chemotherapy

被引:83
作者
Furness, Susan [1 ]
Glenny, Anne-Marie [1 ]
Worthington, Helen V. [1 ]
Pavitt, Sue [2 ]
Oliver, Richard [3 ]
Clarkson, Jan E. [4 ]
Macluskey, Michaelina [5 ]
Chan, Kelvin K. W. [6 ]
Conway, David I. [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Cochrane Oral Hlth Grp, Sch Dent, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Hlth Sci, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[3] RED, Shrewsbury, Salop, England
[4] Univ Dundee, Dent Hlth Serv & Res Unit, Dundee, Scotland
[5] Univ Dundee, Unit Oral Surg & Med, Dundee, Scotland
[6] Princess Margaret Hosp, Toronto, ON M4X 1K9, Canada
[7] Univ Glasgow, Glasgow Dent Sch, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
来源
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS | 2011年 / 04期
关键词
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols [adverse effects; therapeutic use; Carcinoma; Squamous Cell [drug therapy; mortality; radiotherapy; surgery; Combined Modality Therapy [methods; Mouth Neoplasms [drug therapy; Oropharyngeal Neoplasms [drug therapy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Remission Induction; Survival Analysis; Humans; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; LOCALLY ADVANCED HEAD; RANDOMIZED PHASE-II; CISPLATIN PLUS 5-FLUOROURACIL; TRIAL COMPARING RADIOTHERAPY; ADVANCED RESECTABLE HEAD; STAGE-IV HEAD; ACCELERATED HYPERFRACTIONATED RADIOTHERAPY; COMBINED POSTOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; UNRESECTABLE PHARYNGEAL CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD006386.pub3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers are frequently described as part of a group of oral cancers or head and neck cancer. Treatment of oral cavity cancer is generally surgery followed by radiotherapy, whereas oropharyngeal cancers, which are more likely to be advanced at the time of diagnosis, are managed with radiotherapy or chemoradiation. Surgery for oral cancers can be disfiguring and both surgery and radiotherapy have significant functional side effects, notably impaired ability to eat, drink and talk. The development of new chemotherapy agents, new combinations of agents and changes in the relative timing of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy treatments may potentially bring about increases in both survival and quality of life for this group of patients. Objectives To determine whether chemotherapy, in addition to radiotherapy and/or surgery for oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer results in improved survival, disease free survival, progression free survival, locoregional control and reduced recurrence of disease. To determine which regimen and time of administration (induction, concomitant or adjuvant) is associated with better outcomes. Search strategy Electronic searches of the Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED were undertaken on 1st December 2010. Reference lists of recent reviews and included studies were also searched to identify further trials. Selection criteria Randomised controlled trials where more than 50% of participants had primary tumours in the oral cavity or oropharynx, and which compared the addition of chemotherapy to other treatments such as radiotherapy and/or surgery, or compared two or more chemotherapy regimens or modes of administration, were included. Data collection and analysis Eighty-nine trials which met the inclusion criteria were assessed for risk of bias and data were extracted by two or more review authors. The primary outcome was total mortality. Trial authors were contacted for additional information or for clarification. Main results There is evidence of a small increase in overall survival associated with induction chemotherapy compared to locoregional treatment alone (25 trials), hazard ratio (HR) of mortality 0.92 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84 to 1.00, P = 0.06). Post-surgery adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved overall survival compared to surgery +/- radiotherapy alone (10 trials), HR of mortality 0.88 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.99, P = 0.03), and there is some evidence that this improvement may be greater with concomitant adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (4 trials), HR of mortality 0.84 (95% CI 0.72 to 0.98, P = 0.03). In patients with unresectable tumours, there is evidence that concomitant or alternating chemoradiotherapy is associated with improved survival compared to radiotherapy alone (26 trials), HR of mortality 0.78 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.83, P < 0.00001). These findings are confirmed by sensitivity analyses based on studies assessed at low risk of bias. There is insufficient evidence to identify which agent(s) and/or regimen(s) are the most effective. The additional toxicity attributable to chemotherapy in the combined regimens remains unquantified. Authors' conclusions Chemotherapy, in addition to radiotherapy and surgery, is associated with improved overall survival in patients with oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers. Induction chemotherapy may prolong survival by 8 to 20% and adjuvant concomitant chemoradiotherapy may prolong survival by up to 16%. In patients with unresectable tumours, concomitant or alternating chemoradiotherapy may prolong survival by 10 to 22%. There is insufficient evidence as to which agent or regimen is most effective and the additional toxicity associated with chemotherapy given in addition to radiotherapy and/or surgery cannot be quantified.
引用
收藏
页数:234
相关论文
共 476 条
[71]   Hyperfractionated accelerated chemoradiation with concurrent fluorouracil-mitomycin is more effective than dose-escalated hyperfractionated accelerated radiation therapy alone in locally advanced head and neck cancer: Final results of the radiotherapy cooperative clinical trials group of the German cancer society 95-06 prospective randomized trial [J].
Budach, V ;
Stuschke, M ;
Budach, W ;
Baumann, M ;
Geismar, D ;
Grabenbauer, G ;
Lammert, I ;
Jahnke, K ;
Stueben, G ;
Herrmann, T ;
Bamberg, M ;
Wust, P ;
Hinkelbein, W ;
Wernecke, KD .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (06) :1125-1135
[72]  
BUDACH V, 2003, P 45 ANN ASTRO M
[73]   Mitomycin-C and 5-Fluoro-Uracil containing chemotherapy with Concurrent Hyperfractionated Accelerated RadioTherapy (C-HART) of 70.6 Gy is more effective than dose escalated HART of 77.6 Gy alone -: 10 year results of the German multicenter phase III randomized trial (ARO 95-06) [J].
Budach, V. G. F. ;
Poettgen, C. ;
Baumann, M. ;
Budach, W. ;
Grabenbauer, G. ;
Moser, L. ;
Wust, P. ;
Kuczer, D. ;
Jahnke, K. ;
Wernecke, K. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 69 (03) :S11-S11
[74]   Intravenous amifostine during chemoradiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer: A randomized placebo-controlled phase III study [J].
Buentzel, J ;
Micke, O ;
Adamietz, IA ;
Monnier, A ;
Glatzel, M ;
De Vries, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 64 (03) :684-691
[75]  
BUENTZEL J, 2001, P 43 ANN M ASTRO S, P85
[76]  
Buffoli A, 1992, Radiol Med, V83, P636
[77]   Amifostine in simultaneous radiochemotherapy of advanced head and neck cancer [J].
Büntzel, J ;
Glatzel, M ;
Kuttner, K ;
Weinaug, R ;
Fröhlich, D .
SEMINARS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2002, 12 (01) :4-13
[78]   Radiochemotherapy with amifostine cytoprotection for head and neck cancer [J].
Buntzel, J ;
Schuth, J ;
Kuttner, K ;
Glatzel, M .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 1998, 6 (02) :155-160
[79]   Selective cytoprotection with amifostine in concurrent radiochemotherapy for head and neck cancer [J].
Buntzel, J ;
Kuttner, K ;
Frohlich, D ;
Glatzel, M .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1998, 9 (05) :505-509
[80]  
Buntzel~ J, 1998, ANN HEMATOLOGY S2, V77, pS197