Delegation, agency, and agenda setting in the European community

被引:513
作者
Pollack, MA
机构
关键词
MULTIDIMENSIONAL VOTING MODELS; LEGAL INTEGRATION; POLITICS; ARRANGEMENTS; INSTITUTIONS; OUTCOMES; UNION; POWER;
D O I
10.1162/002081897550311
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
The supranational institutions of the European Community (EC)-the EC Commission, the European Court of Justice, and the European Parliament-play a central role in EC governance, yet scholars remain divided on the question of supranational autonomy and influence, with neofunctionalists asserting, and intergovernmentalist denying, an independent causal role for these institutions. The new institutionalism using rational choice theory may overcome this theoretical stalemate by examining the functions that member state principals delegate to supranational agents, the autonomy of agents in carrying out their functions, and agents' ability to set the agenda for the member governments. The autonomy and influence of supranational institutions are a function of four factors: the distribution of preferences among member state principals and their supranational agents, the institutional rules governing EC policymaking, the information available to member governments and supranational agents, and the ability of supranational institutions to build transnational constituencies within the member states.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / +
页数:1
相关论文
共 73 条
[31]  
Lindberg LeonN., 1970, EUROPES WOULD BE POL
[32]  
Majone Giandomenico., 1994, West European Politics, V17, P77, DOI 10.1080/01402389408425031
[33]   LAW AND POLITICS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION - A REPLY TO GARRETT [J].
MATTLI, W ;
SLAUGHTER, AM .
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, 1995, 49 (01) :183-190
[34]  
McCubbins M.D., 1987, J LAW ECON ORGAN, V3, P243, DOI DOI 10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.JLEO.A036930
[35]  
McCubbins MathewD., 1987, Congress: Structure and Policy, P409
[36]   STRUCTURE AND PROCESS, POLITICS AND POLICY - ADMINISTRATIVE ARRANGEMENTS AND THE POLITICAL CONTROL OF AGENCIES [J].
MCCUBBINS, MD ;
NOLL, RG ;
WEINGAST, BR .
VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW, 1989, 75 (02) :431-482
[37]   INTRANSITIVITIES IN MULTIDIMENSIONAL VOTING MODELS AND SOME IMPLICATIONS FOR AGENDA CONTROL [J].
MCKELVEY, RD .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 1976, 12 (03) :472-482
[38]  
MILGROM P, 1990, ECON POLIT-OXFORD, V3, P1
[39]  
Milgrom Paul, 1990, PERSPECTIVES POSITIV, P57, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511571657
[40]   AN ASSESSMENT OF THE POSITIVE THEORY OF CONGRESSIONAL DOMINANCE [J].
MOE, TM .
LEGISLATIVE STUDIES QUARTERLY, 1987, 12 (04) :475-520