Randomized comparison of linezolid (PNU-100766) versus oxacillin-dicloxacillin for treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections

被引:173
作者
Stevens, DL
Smith, LG
Bruss, JB
McConnell-Martin, MA
Duvall, SE
Todd, WM
Hafkin, B
机构
[1] VA Med Ctr, Infect Dis Sect, Boise, ID 83702 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] St Michaels Med Ctr, Newark, NJ USA
[4] Pharmacia & Upjohn Inc, Kalamazoo, MI 49001 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1128/AAC.44.12.3408-3413.2000
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
This randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial compared the efficacy and safety of linezolid, an oxazolidinone, with those of oxacillin-dicloxacillin in patients with complicated skin and soft tissue infections. A total of 826 hospitalized adult patients were randomized to receive linezolid (600 mg intravenously [i.v.]) every 12 h or oxacillin (2 g i.v.) every 6 h; following sufficient clinical improvement, patients were switched to the respective oral agents (linezolid [600 mg orally] every 12 h or dicloxacillin [500 mg orally] every 6 hours). Primary efficacy variables were clinical cure rates in both the intent-to-treat (ITT) population and clinically evaluable (CE) patients and microbiological success rate in microbiologically evaluable (ME) patients. Safety and tolerability were evaluated in the ITT population. Demographics and baseline characteristics were similar across treatment groups in the 819 ITT patients. In the ITT population, the clinical cure rates were 69.8 and 64.9% in the linezolid and oxacillin dicloxacillin groups, respectively (P = 0.141; 95% confidence interval -1.58 to 11.25). In 298 CE linezolid-treated patients, the clinical cure rate was 88.6%, compared with a cure rate of 85.8% in 302 CE patients who received oxacillin-dicloxacillin. In 143 ME linezolid-treated patients, the microbiological success rate was 88.1%, compared with a success rate of 86.1% in 151 ME patients who received oxacillin-dicloxacillin. Both agents were well tolerated; most adverse events were of mild-to moderate intensity. No serious drug-related adverse events were reported in the linezolid group. These data support the use of linezolid for the treatment of adults with complicated skin and soft tissue infections.
引用
收藏
页码:3408 / 3413
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Current concepts - Streptococcal infections of skin and soft tissues [J].
Bisno, AL ;
Stevens, DL .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 334 (04) :240-245
[2]  
Brickner SJ, 1996, CURR PHARM DESIGN, V2, P175
[3]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 1997, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, V46, P813
[4]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 1997, MMWR MORB MORTAL WKL, V46, P765
[5]   Analysis of antibiotic susceptibilities of skin wound flora in hospitalized dermatology patients - The crisis of antibiotic resistance has come to the surface [J].
Colsky, AS ;
Kirsner, RS ;
Kerdel, FA .
ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY, 1998, 134 (08) :1006-1009
[6]   MECHANISM OF ACTION AND INVITRO AND INVIVO ACTIVITIES OF S-6123, A NEW OXAZOLIDINONE COMPOUND [J].
DALY, JS ;
ELIOPOULOS, GM ;
WILLEY, S ;
MOELLERING, RC .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1988, 32 (09) :1341-1346
[7]   INTERACTIONS OF MONOAMINE-OXIDASE WITH SUBSTRATES AND INHIBITORS [J].
DOSTERT, PL ;
BENEDETTI, MS ;
TIPTON, KF .
MEDICINAL RESEARCH REVIEWS, 1989, 9 (01) :45-89
[8]  
Dresser LD, 1998, PHARMACOTHERAPY, V18, P456
[9]   In vitro activities of new oxazolidinone antimicrobial agents against enterococci [J].
Eliopoulos, GM ;
Wennersten, CB ;
Gold, HS ;
Moellering, RC .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1996, 40 (07) :1745-1747
[10]   In vivo activities of U-100592 and U-100766, novel oxazolidinone antimicrobial agents, against experimental bacterial infections [J].
Ford, CW ;
Hamel, JC ;
Wilson, DM ;
Moerman, JK ;
Stapert, D ;
Yancey, RJ ;
Hutchinson, DK ;
Barbachyn, MR ;
Brickner, SJ .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1996, 40 (06) :1508-1513