Randomized comparison of linezolid (PNU-100766) versus oxacillin-dicloxacillin for treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections

被引:173
作者
Stevens, DL
Smith, LG
Bruss, JB
McConnell-Martin, MA
Duvall, SE
Todd, WM
Hafkin, B
机构
[1] VA Med Ctr, Infect Dis Sect, Boise, ID 83702 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] St Michaels Med Ctr, Newark, NJ USA
[4] Pharmacia & Upjohn Inc, Kalamazoo, MI 49001 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1128/AAC.44.12.3408-3413.2000
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
This randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial compared the efficacy and safety of linezolid, an oxazolidinone, with those of oxacillin-dicloxacillin in patients with complicated skin and soft tissue infections. A total of 826 hospitalized adult patients were randomized to receive linezolid (600 mg intravenously [i.v.]) every 12 h or oxacillin (2 g i.v.) every 6 h; following sufficient clinical improvement, patients were switched to the respective oral agents (linezolid [600 mg orally] every 12 h or dicloxacillin [500 mg orally] every 6 hours). Primary efficacy variables were clinical cure rates in both the intent-to-treat (ITT) population and clinically evaluable (CE) patients and microbiological success rate in microbiologically evaluable (ME) patients. Safety and tolerability were evaluated in the ITT population. Demographics and baseline characteristics were similar across treatment groups in the 819 ITT patients. In the ITT population, the clinical cure rates were 69.8 and 64.9% in the linezolid and oxacillin dicloxacillin groups, respectively (P = 0.141; 95% confidence interval -1.58 to 11.25). In 298 CE linezolid-treated patients, the clinical cure rate was 88.6%, compared with a cure rate of 85.8% in 302 CE patients who received oxacillin-dicloxacillin. In 143 ME linezolid-treated patients, the microbiological success rate was 88.1%, compared with a success rate of 86.1% in 151 ME patients who received oxacillin-dicloxacillin. Both agents were well tolerated; most adverse events were of mild-to moderate intensity. No serious drug-related adverse events were reported in the linezolid group. These data support the use of linezolid for the treatment of adults with complicated skin and soft tissue infections.
引用
收藏
页码:3408 / 3413
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[21]   First clinical isolate of vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus in a French hospital [J].
Ploy, MC ;
Grélaud, C ;
Martin, C ;
de Lumley, L ;
Denis, F .
LANCET, 1998, 351 (9110) :1212-1212
[22]  
RUBINSTEIN E, IN PRESS CLIN INFECT
[23]   Comparative in vitro activities and postantibiotic effects of the oxazolidinone compounds eperezolid (PNU-100592) and linezolid (PNU-100766) versus vancomycin against Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci, Enterococcus faecalis, and Enterococcus faecium [J].
Rybak, MJ ;
Cappelletty, DM ;
Moldovan, T ;
Aeschlimann, JR ;
Kaatz, GW .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1998, 42 (03) :721-724
[24]   EFFECT OF ANTIBIOTICS ON TOXIN PRODUCTION AND VIABILITY OF CLOSTRIDIUM-PERFRINGENS [J].
STEVENS, DL ;
MAIER, KA ;
MITTEN, JE .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1987, 31 (02) :213-218
[25]  
STEVENS DL, 1995, CLIN INFECT DIS S2, V20, P154
[26]   The oxazolidinone linezolid inhibits initiation of protein synthesis in bacteria [J].
Swaney, SM ;
Aoki, H ;
Ganoza, MC ;
Shinabarger, DL .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1998, 42 (12) :3251-3255
[27]  
Swartz MN, 1990, PRINCIPLES PRACTICES, V3rd, P796
[28]  
SWARTZ MN, 1990, PRINCIPLES PRACTICE, P808
[29]   METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS IN EUROPE [J].
VOSS, A ;
MILATOVIC, D ;
WALLRAUCHSCHWARZ, C ;
ROSDAHL, VT ;
BRAVENY, I .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1994, 13 (01) :50-55
[30]   Bacteremia caused by staphylococci with inducible vancomycin heteroresistance [J].
Wong, SSY ;
Ho, PL ;
Woo, PCY ;
Yuen, KY .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1999, 29 (04) :760-767