K-select analysis: a new method to analyse habitat selection in radio-tracking studies

被引:70
作者
Calenge, C [1 ]
Dufour, AB
Maillard, D
机构
[1] Univ Lyon 1, UMR CNRS 5558, Lab Biometrie & Biol Evolut, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France
[2] Off Natl Chasse & Faune Sauvage, F-34098 Montpellier, France
关键词
eigenanalysis; functional responses; hindcasting studies; marginality; radio-tracking;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.12.005
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Two kinds of wildlife habitat studies can be distinguished in the literature: hindcasting and forecasting studies. Hindcasting studies aim to emphasize among a large set of habitat variables those that are of interest for the focus species, whereas forecasting studies are intended to predict habitat selection according to a small number of habitat variables for a given area. We provide here a new analytical tool which relies on the concept of ecological niche, the K-select analysis, for hindcasting studies of habitat selection by animals using radio-tracking data. Each habitat variable defines one dimension in the ecological space. For each animal, the difference between the vector of average available habitat conditions and the vector of average used conditions defines the marginality vector. Its size is proportional to the importance of habitat selection, and its direction indicates which variables are selected. By performing a non-centered principal component analysis of the table containing the coordinates of the marginality vectors of each animal (row) on the habitat variables (column), the K-select analysis returns a linear combination of habitat variables for which the average marginality is greatest. It is a synthesis of variables which contributes the most to the habitat selection. As with principal component analysis, the biological significance of the factorial axes is deduced from the loading of variables. An example is provided: habitat selection by wild boar is studied in a Mediterranean habitat using the K-select analysis. The numerous advantages of the analysis (a large number of variables that can be included, individual variability in habitat selection taken into account, a lack of too strict underlying hypotheses) make it a powerful approach in radio-tracking studies designed to identify habitat variables that are selected by animals. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 153
页数:11
相关论文
共 38 条
[31]   Invited paper: A proposed research emphasis to overcome the limits of wildlife-habitat relationship studies [J].
Morrison, ML .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2001, 65 (04) :613-623
[32]  
Mysterud A, 1998, ECOLOGY, V79, P1435, DOI 10.2307/176754
[33]   DATA TRANSFORMATIONS IN ECOLOGICAL ORDINATION .1. SOME ADVANTAGES OF NON-CENTERING [J].
NOYMEIR, I .
JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 1973, 61 (02) :329-341
[34]   Autocorrelation of location estimates and the analysis of radiotracking data [J].
Otis, DL ;
White, GC .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1999, 63 (03) :1039-1044
[35]   ANNUAL VARIATION IN HABITAT SELECTION - PATTERNS CONCEALED BY POOLED DATA [J].
SCHOOLEY, RL .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1994, 58 (02) :367-374
[36]   TESTING FOR INDEPENDENCE OF OBSERVATIONS IN ANIMAL MOVEMENTS [J].
SWIHART, RK ;
SLADE, NA .
ECOLOGY, 1985, 66 (04) :1176-1184
[37]   AN ANALYSIS AND SYNTHESIS OF MULTIPLE CORRESPONDENCE-ANALYSIS, OPTIMAL-SCALING, DUAL SCALING, HOMOGENEITY ANALYSIS AND OTHER METHODS FOR QUANTIFYING CATEGORICAL MULTIVARIATE DATA [J].
TENENHAUS, M ;
YOUNG, FW .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1985, 50 (01) :91-119
[38]   STUDY DESIGNS AND TESTS FOR COMPARING RESOURCE USE AND AVAILABILITY [J].
THOMAS, DL ;
TAYLOR, EJ .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1990, 54 (02) :322-330