13C NMR quantitative spectrometric data-activity relationship (QSDAR) models of steroids binding the aromatase enzyme

被引:25
作者
Beger, RD [1 ]
Buzatu, DA [1 ]
Wilkes, JG [1 ]
Lay, JO [1 ]
机构
[1] US FDA, Natl Ctr Toxicol Res, Div Chem, Jefferson, AR 72079 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES | 2001年 / 41卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
10.1021/ci010285e
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Five quantitative spectroscopic data-activity relationships (QSDAR) models for 50 steroidal inhibitors binding to aromatase enzyme have been developed based on simulated C-13 nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) data. Three of the models were based on comparative spectral analysis (CoSA), and the two other models were based on comparative structurally assigned spectral analysis (CoSASA). A CoSA QSDAR model based on five principal components had an explained variance (r(2)) of 0.78 and a leave-one-out (LOO) cross-validated variance (q(2)) of 0.71. A CoSASA model that used the assigned C-13 NMR chemical shifts from a steroidal backbone at five selected positions gave an r(2) of 0.75 and a q2 of 0.66. The C-13 NMR chemical shifts from atoms in the steroid template position 9, 6, 3, and 7 each had correlations greater than 0.6 with the relative binding activity to the aromatase enzyme. All five QSDAR models had explained and cross-validated variances that were better than the explained and cross-validated variances from a five structural parameter quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) model of the same compounds. QSAR modeling suffers from errors introduced by the assumptions and approximations used in partial charges, dielectric constants, and the molecular alignment process of one structural conformation. One postulated reason that the variances of QSDAR models are better than the QSAR models is that C-13 NMR spectral data, based on quantum mechanical principles, are more reflective of binding than the QSAR model's calculated electrostatic potentials and molecular alignment process. The QSDAR models provide a rapid, simple way to model the steroid inhibitor activity in relation to the aromatase enzyme.
引用
收藏
页码:1360 / 1366
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
*ACD LABS, CNMR SOFTW VERS 4 0
[2]  
BAFFES PT, 1991, NETS VERSION 3 0
[3]   13C NMR and electron ionization mass spectrometric data-activity relationship model of estrogen receptor binding [J].
Beger, RD ;
Freeman, JP ;
Lay, JO ;
Wilkes, JG ;
Miller, DW .
TOXICOLOGY AND APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY, 2000, 169 (01) :17-25
[4]   Producing 13C NMR, infrared absorption, and electron ionization mass spectrometric data models of the monodechlorination of chlorobenzenes, chlorophenols, and chloroanilines [J].
Beger, RD ;
Freeman, JP ;
Lay, JO ;
Wilkes, JG ;
Miller, DW .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 2000, 40 (06) :1449-1455
[5]  
BEGER RD, 2001, IN PRESS J COMPUT AI
[6]  
BERGER RD, 2001, IN PRESS J CHEM INF
[7]  
Branbury S. P., 1995, TOXICOLOGY, V25, P67
[8]  
Bremser W, 1977, ANAL CHIM ACTA, V103, P355
[9]   AROMATASE INHIBITORS IN THE TREATMENT OF BREAST-CANCER [J].
BRODIE, AMH .
JOURNAL OF STEROID BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1994, 49 (4-6) :281-287
[10]   AROMATASE AND ITS INHIBITORS IN BREAST-CANCER-TREATMENT - OVERVIEW AND PERSPECTIVE [J].
BRODIE, AMH ;
SANTEN, RJ .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 1994, 30 (01) :1-6