Diabetes-, stress- and ageing-related changes in synaptic plasticity in hippocampus and neocortex - The same metaplastic process?

被引:42
作者
Artola, Alain [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Clermont1, INSERM, E216, F-63000 Clermont Ferrand, France
关键词
long-term potentiation; long-term depression; metaplasticity; diabetes mellitus; stress; ageing;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejphar.2007.11.084
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Learning and memory in the brain likely occur through activity-dependent, long-lasting changes in synaptic transmission. Two opposite activity-dependent synaptic modifications have been identified so far, long-term potentiation and long-term depression. In many brain areas including hippocampal CA1 and neocortex, the level of postsynaptic depolarization controls the magnitude and sign of plasticity: long-term depression is obtained after low depolarizations, whereas long-term potentiation requires stronger ones. Synaptic plasticity also depends on prior synaptic activity. Activity-dependent modulation of subsequent induction of synaptic plasticity, termed "priming" or "metaplasticity", is due, at least in part, to concomitant opposite shifts in the levels of postsynaptic depolarization needed to elicit synaptic plasticity: in previously activated or potentiated synapses, induction of long-term potentiation requires a larger depolarization and that of long-term depression a smaller one compared with naive synapses - i.e. potentiation is inhibited and depression promoted - and vice versa in depressed synapses. Many species including humans express cognitive deficits during ageing, diseases (diabetes mellitus, ...) and psychological insults (stress, ...). Interestingly, diabetic, stressed and aged rats show robust long-term depression and long-term potentiation. But, as in metaplasticity, induction of long-term potentiation requires a larger postsynaptic depolarization and that of long-term depression a smaller one compared with young control animals. Moreover, diabetes- and activity-dependent modulation of synaptic plasticity exhibit occlusion. This suggests that diabetes, stress and ageing act on synaptic plasticity through common mechanisms with metaplasticity. Such persistent inhibition of long-term potentiation and facilitation of long-term depression might lead to activity-dependent synapse weakening and contribute to cognitive impairments. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 162
页数:10
相关论文
共 143 条
[1]  
Abraham WC, 1997, HIPPOCAMPUS, V7, P137, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1063(1997)7:2<137::AID-HIPO3>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-K
[3]   Metaplasticity: A new vista across the field of synaptic plasticity [J].
Abraham, WC ;
Tate, WP .
PROGRESS IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 1997, 52 (04) :303-323
[4]   Metaplasticity: The plasticity of synaptic plasticity [J].
Abraham, WC ;
Bear, MF .
TRENDS IN NEUROSCIENCES, 1996, 19 (04) :126-130
[5]   Chronic unpredictable stress impairs long-term potentiation in rat hippocampal CA1 area and dentate gyrus in vitro [J].
Alfarez, DN ;
Joëls, M ;
Krugers, HJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2003, 17 (09) :1928-1934
[6]   The relationship between type 2 diabetes and cognitive dysfunction: longitudinal studies and their methodological limitations [J].
Allen, KV ;
Frier, BM ;
Strachan, MWJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2004, 490 (1-3) :169-175
[7]  
Amer Diabet Assoc, 2002, DIABETES CARE, V25, P213
[8]   LONG-TERM DEPRESSION OF EXCITATORY SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO LONG-TERM POTENTIATION [J].
ARTOLA, A ;
SINGER, W .
TRENDS IN NEUROSCIENCES, 1993, 16 (11) :480-487
[9]   Long-lasting modulation of the induction of LTD and LTP in rat hippocampal CA1 by behavioural stress and environmental enrichment [J].
Artola, A ;
von Frijtag, JC ;
Fermont, PCJ ;
Gispen, WH ;
Schrama, LH ;
Kamal, A ;
Spruijt, BM .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2006, 23 (01) :261-272
[10]   Diabetes mellitus concomitantly facilitates the induction of long-term depression and inhibits that of long-term potentiation in hippocampus [J].
Artola, A ;
Kamal, A ;
Ramakers, GMJ ;
Biessels, GJ ;
Gispen, WH .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2005, 22 (01) :169-178