A systematic technique to estimate positioning errors for robot accuracy improvement using laser interferometry based sensing

被引:188
作者
Alici, G [1 ]
Shirinzadeh, B
机构
[1] Univ Wollongong, Sch Mech Mat & Mechatron Engn, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Robot & Mechatron Res Lab, Dept Mech Engn, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
robot calibration; laser-based dynamic sensing; parameter estimation; error estimation and compensation;
D O I
10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2004.12.012
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
This paper presents a systematic approach for representing and estimating the Cartesian positioning errors of robot manipulators with analytical functions such as Fourier polynomials and ordinary polynomials. A Motoman SK 120 robot manipulator was employed as an experimental system to evaluate the efficacy of the approach. As a complementary part of this evaluation process, the kinematic parameters of the experimental system are also identified. The position data needed throughout this study were provided by a laser-based dynamic measurement system. The coefficients of the polynomials and the kinematic parameters are determined using the position data for a number of identification configurations. The proposed approximation and estimation approach is verified experimentally for three exemplary Cartesian space trajectories, which describe different configurations of the manipulator. The errors estimated through the polynomials are then corrected using a first-order approximation of the inverse kinematic model. The numerical and experimental results prove that the analytical functions are accurate enough to estimate manipulator position errors without needing further experimental data. The principal conclusion is that our approach of estimating position errors with some analytical functions is practical and generic, and most importantly it is effective enough to improve robot accuracy. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:879 / 906
页数:28
相关论文
共 27 条
[11]   The calibration index and taxonomy for robot kinematic calibration methods [J].
Hollerbach, JM ;
Wampler, CW .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROBOTICS RESEARCH, 1996, 15 (06) :573-591
[12]  
IURASCU CC, 2003, ASME, V125, P23
[13]  
JACKSON D, 1930, COLLOQUIUM PUBLICATI, V11, P1
[14]   Calibration of geometric and non-geometric errors of an industrial robot [J].
Jang, JH ;
Kim, SH ;
Kwak, YK .
ROBOTICA, 2001, 19 (19) :311-321
[15]  
Meggiolaro MA, 1999, ICRA '99: IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION, VOLS 1-4, PROCEEDINGS, P2819, DOI 10.1109/ROBOT.1999.774024
[16]  
Mooring B. W., 1991, Fundamentals of Manipulator Calibration
[17]  
Newman W. S., 2000, Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065), P3597, DOI 10.1109/ROBOT.2000.845292
[18]  
Omodei A, 2000, J ROBOTIC SYST, V17, P291, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4563(200006)17:6<291::AID-ROB1>3.0.CO
[19]  
2-U
[20]  
PAYANNET D, 1985, P 15 INT S IND ROB, P857