Species composition in fragmented forests: conservation implications of changing forest area

被引:62
作者
Hill, JL
Curran, PJ
机构
[1] Univ W England, Fac Built Environm, Sch Geog & Environm Management, Bristol BS16 1QY, Avon, England
[2] Univ Southampton, Dept Geog, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hants, England
关键词
biodiversity; conservation; forest fragmentation; species-area relationships; tropical rainforest;
D O I
10.1016/S0143-6228(01)00002-9
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
An important aspect of forest fragmentation is the ensuing change in forest area and the impact this has on species number and composition. Quantifying this is an important step in prioritizing forest fragments for biodiversity conservation. Species-area curves from isolated forest fragments in Ghana, West Africa, show that large forests contain the greatest number of tree species. Moreover, the additional species found within the larger forest fragments follow a predictable pattern rather than acting as random complements from the community. The proportion of rare tree species increases with forest area, but common species form a stable foundation comprising around two-thirds of the total forest complement. As the area of forest fragments increases, edge effects decrease and the relative proportions of evergreen and shade-tolerating species increase with respect to deciduous pioneers. The use of species-area curves to determine the capacity of small forest remnants to support species diversity should consequently be assessed with respect to the component species. Increasing fragmentation will result in the loss of a valuable portion of the forest ecosystem: the ran and shade-tolerating species. These species will be more effectively preserved within larger forest reserves. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 174
页数:18
相关论文
共 83 条
[71]   WHAT TO PROTECT - SYSTEMATICS AND THE AGONY OF CHOICE [J].
VANEWRIGHT, RI ;
HUMPHRIES, CJ ;
WILLIAMS, PH .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1991, 55 (03) :235-254
[72]   Choice of species-area function affects identification of hotspots [J].
Veech, JA .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2000, 14 (01) :140-147
[73]  
Watson H.C., 1835, REMARKS GEOGRAPHICAL
[74]   ON THE PRACTICE OF ECOLOGY [J].
WEINER, J .
JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 1995, 83 (01) :153-158
[75]  
WESTERN D, 1989, CONSERVATION 21 CENT, P31
[76]   SYSTEMATICS, THE SCIENTIFIC BASIS FOR INVENTORIES OF BIODIVERSITY [J].
WHEELER, QD .
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 1995, 4 (05) :476-489
[77]  
WHITTAKER RJ, 1992, J BIOGEOGR, V19, P587
[78]   SPATIAL SCALING IN ECOLOGY [J].
WIENS, JA .
FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 1989, 3 (04) :385-397
[79]  
Williams Paul H., 1994, Biodiversity Letters, V2, P67, DOI 10.2307/2999760
[80]   THE OPTIMIZATION OF BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION [J].
WITTING, L ;
LOESCHCKE, V .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1995, 71 (02) :205-207