Event justice perceptions and employees' reactions: Perceptions of social entity justice as a moderator

被引:89
作者
Choi, Jaepil [1 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Management Org, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
event justice; social entity justice; organization entity justice; supervisor entity justice;
D O I
10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.513
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Building on 2 paradigms in organizational justice research and on fairness heuristic theory, the author argues that employees' perceptions about the fairness of social entities (their supervisor and their organization) moderate the relationship between their perceptions about the fairness of specific events and their reactions. A survey of 265 supervisor-employee pairs in 4 companies was conducted to test this argument. Hierarchical linear modeling analyses showed that when employees perceived their organization to be generally fair, this perception moderated the relationship between the perceived justice of a particular event and their reactions to the organization (organizational commitment and organization-directed citizenship behavior). In addition, employees' perceptions of the fairness of their supervisor were found to moderate the relationship between the perceived justice of a particular event and their supervisor-directed responses (trust in managers and supervisor-directed citizenship behavior) and their organization-directed responses. The results suggest that employee attitudes and behavior can be better understood when both event justice perceptions and social entity justice perceptions are considered together.
引用
收藏
页码:513 / 528
页数:16
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]  
ADAMS JS, 1965, ADV EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V2, P267
[2]  
Aiken L. S., 1991, Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions
[3]   The relationship between justice and attitudes: An examination of justice effects on event and system-related attitudes [J].
Ambrose, Maureen ;
Hess, Ronald L. ;
Ganesan, Shankar .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2007, 103 (01) :21-36
[4]  
Ambrose ML, 2005, HANDBOOK OF ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE, P59
[5]   STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE - A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED 2-STEP APPROACH [J].
ANDERSON, JC ;
GERBING, DW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) :411-423
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1999, 14 ANN C SOC IND ORG
[7]   Consequences of organizational justice expectations in a selection system [J].
Bell, BS ;
Wiechmann, D ;
Ryan, AM .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 91 (02) :455-466
[8]  
BIES RJ, 1988, ACAD MANAGE J, V31, P676, DOI 10.5465/256465
[9]  
Blader StevenL., 2003, HUM RESOUR MANAGE R, V13, P107, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S1053-4822, DOI 10.1016/S1053-4822(02)00101-8]
[10]  
Bliese P., 2002, MEASURING ANAL BEHAV, P401