Perceptions of unfairness in allocations between multiple recipients

被引:12
作者
Eriksson, Kimmo [1 ,2 ]
Simpson, Brent [3 ]
机构
[1] Malardalen Univ, Sch Educ Culture & Commun, S-72123 Vasteras, Sweden
[2] Stockholm Univ, Ctr Study Cultural Evolut, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Univ S Carolina, Dept Sociol, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Perception; Unfairness; Distributive justice; Need to belong; EQUITY SENSITIVITY; FAIRNESS; JUDGMENTS; JUSTICE; VICTIM; FEAR;
D O I
10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.01.001
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This paper introduces a new model to explain perceptions of unfairness in resource allocations between multiple recipients. The model yields several novel predictions, all confirmed in a series of new empirical tests. For instance, while much prior research focuses on the differences between the judge's share and others' shares, we argue that people also care about differences between others' shares. In particular, the presence of a single loser increases perceptions of unfairness. We also study individual variation in sensitivity to the single-loser dimension. Most centrally, we offer empirical support for the existence - indeed the prevalence - of ostraphobics, individuals with an acute sensitivity to being "ostracized" as a sole loser. We show that ostraphobics perceive unfairness more strongly than other types, are higher in need to belong and fear of negative evaluation, and are more prone to a heretofore unrecognized type of preference reversal with respect to fairness. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 244
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Differences in Fear of Isolation as an explanation of Cultural Differences: Evidence from memory and reasoning [J].
Kim, Kyungil ;
Markman, Arthur B. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 42 (03) :350-364
[32]   A TEST AND REFINEMENT OF THE EQUITY SENSITIVITY CONSTRUCT [J].
KING, WC ;
MILES, EW ;
DAY, DD .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 1993, 14 (04) :301-317
[33]   The "Identified victim" effect: An identified group, or just a single individual? [J].
Kogut, T ;
Ritov, I .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 2005, 18 (03) :157-167
[34]  
Konow J., 2005, SOCIAL JUSTICE RES, V18, P349, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11211-005-8566-6
[35]   A BRIEF VERSION OF THE FEAR OF NEGATIVE EVALUATION SCALE [J].
LEARY, MR .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 1983, 9 (03) :371-375
[36]  
Mason W., 2010, P ACM SIGKDD WORKSH, V11, P100, DOI DOI 10.1145/1600150.1600175
[37]   FAIRNESS AND PREFERENCE [J].
MESSICK, DM ;
SENTIS, KP .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1979, 15 (04) :418-434
[38]   Experiments behind the veil: Structural influences on judgments of social justice [J].
Mitchell, G ;
Tetlock, PE ;
Newman, DG ;
Lerner, JS .
POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 24 (03) :519-547
[39]  
Neiman Susan., 2009, MORAL CLARITY GUIDE
[40]  
Paolacci G, 2010, JUDGM DECIS MAK, V5, P411