Suggesting frameworks of citizen-sourcing via Government 2.0

被引:203
作者
Taewoo Nam [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Albany, Albany, NY 12222 USA
关键词
Crowd-sourcing; Citizen-sourcing; Wisdom of crowds; Government; 2.0; Open government; PARTICIPATION; TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.giq.2011.07.005
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Through various platforms enabled by Web 2.0 technologies, citizens can collectively create public information, provide service, and take part in policy processes. Pushed by the Open Government Directive of the Obama administration, citizen-sourcing may be a new mode of government operations in the U.S. This paper suggests two frameworks to examine the emerging mechanism. The first framework provides three dimensions of citizen-sourcing initiatives: purpose (image-making or ideation), collective intelligence type (professional knowledge or innovative ideas), and strategy (contest, wiki, social networking, or social voting). Second, the paper presents a framework for assessing current citizen-sourcing initiatives. Its categories include design evaluation, process evaluation, and outcome evaluation. The performance of citizen-sourcing primarily depends on the appropriateness of the platform design. The effectiveness of the process needs to be evaluated in terms of the Open Government Directive's three pillar goals of transparency, participation, and collaboration. Evaluating the impact of citizen-sourcing will reveal whether citizen-sourcing is rhetorical or if it actually exerts significant effects on society. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 20
页数:9
相关论文
共 90 条
[81]   Against deliberation [J].
Sanders, LM .
POLITICAL THEORY, 1997, 25 (03) :347-376
[82]  
Sartori Giovanni., 1994, COMP NATIONS CONCEPT, P14
[83]  
Schellong A., 2009, EU eGovernment Benchmarking 2010+: General remarks on the future of benchmarking Digital Government in the EU
[85]   Creating a smart nation: Strategy, policy, intelligence, and information [J].
SteeleVivas, RD .
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 1996, 13 (02) :159-173
[86]   Deliberative trouble? Why groups go to extremes [J].
Sunstein, CR .
YALE LAW JOURNAL, 2000, 110 (01) :71-119
[87]  
Surowiecki, 2004, The wisdom of crowds why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies, and nations
[88]  
Tapscott D., 1995, DIGITAL EC PROMISE P
[89]  
Tyler T., 1991, Contemporary Sociology, V20, P914, DOI [10.2307/2076193, DOI 10.2307/2076193]
[90]  
Verba S., 1995, VOICE EQUALITY CIVIC, DOI DOI 10.2307/J.CTV1PNC1K7