Does China's carbon emissions trading policy improve the technology innovation of relevant enterprises?

被引:166
作者
Zhang, Yue-Jun [1 ,2 ]
Shi, Wei [1 ,2 ]
Jiang, Lin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Univ, Business Sch, Changsha 410082, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Hunan Univ, Ctr Resource & Environm Management, Changsha 410082, Hunan, Peoples R China
关键词
carbon emissions trading; CET-covered enterprises; DID models; environmental management; technology innovation; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; PORTER HYPOTHESIS; EFFICIENCY GAINS; PROPENSITY SCORE; CO2; EMISSIONS; IMPACT; INDUSTRY; SCHEME;
D O I
10.1002/bse.2404
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
China's carbon emissions trading (CET) policy aims to force relevant enterprises to implement low-carbon technology innovation and address environmental challenges through marketization means. However, how China's CET policy may affect enterprise technology innovation and whether this effect may differ in industries remain to be further investigated. Therefore, based on the panel data of listed enterprises covered by the CET policy in China during 2009-2017, this paper employs the difference-in-difference (DID) and DID-based propensity score matching models to evaluate the effect of CET on technology innovation. The empirical results indicate that the effect of China's CET on the technology innovation of related enterprises is generally not significant during the sample period, but this effect presents evident industrial heterogeneity. Specifically, among the eight CET-covered industries, the CET policy helps to improve technology innovation for power and aviation enterprises but not in the other six industries (i.e., steel, chemical, building material, petrochemical, nonferrous metals, and paper), which implies that China's CET policy still has great potential for promoting the technology innovation of related enterprises. In addition, the central findings remain robust when the system generalized method of moment and DID-based coarsened exact matching models are applied to consider the influence of omitted variables, unobservable confounders, and different matching methods.
引用
收藏
页码:872 / 885
页数:14
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]   Bias-Corrected Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects [J].
Abadie, Alberto ;
Imbens, Guido W. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 2011, 29 (01) :1-11
[2]   Financial dependence and innovation: The case of public versus private firms [J].
Acharya, Viral ;
Xu, Zhaoxia .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 124 (02) :223-243
[3]   Innovation and Institutional Ownership [J].
Aghion, Philippe ;
Van Reenen, John ;
Zingales, Luigi .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2013, 103 (01) :277-304
[4]   Environmental policies and productivity growth: Evidence across industries and firms [J].
Albrizio, Silvia ;
Kozluk, Tomasz ;
Zipperer, Vera .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 81 :209-226
[5]   The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness? [J].
Ambec, Stefan ;
Cohen, Mark A. ;
Elgie, Stewart ;
Lanoie, Paul .
REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2013, 7 (01) :2-22
[6]   Corporate governance and green innovation [J].
Amore, Mario Daniele ;
Bennedsen, Morten .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 75 :54-72
[7]   Credit supply and corporate innovation [J].
Amore, Mario Daniele ;
Schneider, Cedric ;
Zaldokas, Alminas .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 109 (03) :835-855
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Statistical review of world energy [R/OL]
[9]   ANOTHER LOOK AT THE INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLE ESTIMATION OF ERROR-COMPONENTS MODELS [J].
ARELLANO, M ;
BOVER, O .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1995, 68 (01) :29-51
[10]   Do Hostile Takeovers Stifle Innovation? Evidence from Antitakeover Legislation and Corporate Patenting [J].
Atanassov, Julian .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2013, 68 (03) :1097-1131