The functional assessment of cancer therapy-BRM (FACT-BRM): A new tool for the assessment of quality of life in patients treated with biologic response modifiers

被引:35
作者
Bacik, J
Mazumdar, M
Murphy, BA
Fairclough, DL
Eremenco, S
Mariani, T
Motzer, RJ
Cella, D
机构
[1] Evanston NW Healthcare, Ctr Outcomes Res & Educ, Evanston, IL 60201 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Div Solid Tumor Oncol, Genitourinary Oncol Serv, New York, NY 10021 USA
[4] Cornell Univ, Weill Med Coll, Dept Med, New York, NY USA
[5] Vanderbilt Univ, Nashville, TN USA
[6] Univ Colorado, Hlth Sci Ctr, Denver, CO USA
[7] Northwestern Univ, Robert H Lurie Comprehens Canc Ctr, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
biologic response modifiers; FACT-G; FACT-BRM; quality of life assessment; renal cell carcinoma;
D O I
10.1023/B:QURE.0000015297.91158.01
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: This paper reports on the development and validation of two biologic response modifier (BRM) subscales for use with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) quality of life (QOL) questionnaire. Methods: Using the FACT-G as a base, 17 additional questions related to symptoms common to interferon and retinoid therapy were developed. Data collected at baseline (n = 191) and week 2 (n = 168) in a randomized trial of interferon +/-13-cis-retinoic acid in advanced renal cell carcinoma patients were used to validate this measure. Results: Using a combined empirical and conceptual approach, the 17 questions were reduced to 13 questions consisting of two subscales: 'BRM-physical' (7 items; baseline coefficient alpha(alpha) = 0.70; week-2 alpha = 0.75) and 'BRM-mental' (6 items; baseline alpha = 0.79; week-2 alpha = 0.78). Internal consistency of the trial outcome index (TOI) combining physical well-being, functional well-being and the BRM subscales, was 0.91 for baseline assessments and 0.92 for week 2. Discriminant validity was demonstrated for the TOI by its ability to differentiate among prognostic risk groups, and for the total FACT-G, TOI and total FACT-BRM scores by their ability to distinguish between groups differing in performance, response and toxicity status. Conclusions: The 'BRM-physical' and 'BRM-mental' subscales can be combined with the FACT-G to form the 'FACT-BRM' scale, useful for measuring QOL in cancer patients who are receiving treatment with biologic response modifiers.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 154
页数:18
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]
Multilingual translation of the functional assessment of cancer therapy (FACT) quality of life measurement system [J].
Bonomi, AE ;
Cella, DF ;
Hahn, EA ;
Bjordal, K ;
SpernerUnterweger, B ;
Gangeri, L ;
Bergman, B ;
WillemsGroot, J ;
Hanquet, P ;
Zittoun, R .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1996, 5 (03) :309-320
[2]
Borden EC, 1998, SEMIN ONCOL, V25, P3
[3]
Cattell R. B., 1966, HDB MULTIVARIATE EXP
[4]
SCREE TEST FOR NUMBER OF FACTORS [J].
CATTELL, RB .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 1966, 1 (02) :245-276
[5]
Cella D, 1997, MANUAL FUNCTIONAL AS
[6]
THE FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF CANCER-THERAPY SCALE - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF THE GENERAL MEASURE [J].
CELLA, DF ;
TULSKY, DS ;
GRAY, G ;
SARAFIAN, B ;
LINN, E ;
BONOMI, A ;
SILBERMAN, M ;
YELLEN, SB ;
WINICOUR, P ;
BRANNON, J ;
ECKBERG, K ;
LLOYD, S ;
PURL, S ;
BLENDOWSKI, C ;
GOODMAN, M ;
BARNICLE, M ;
STEWART, I ;
MCHALE, M ;
BONOMI, P ;
KAPLAN, E ;
TAYLOR, S ;
THOMAS, CR ;
HARRIS, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1993, 11 (03) :570-579
[7]
CHAPMAN PB, 1998, CUTANEOUS MELANOMA, P419
[8]
Cronbach LJ, 1951, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V16, P297
[9]
Quality of life, cancer investigation, and clinical practice [J].
Fairclough, DL .
CANCER INVESTIGATION, 1998, 16 (07) :478-484
[10]
Functional assessment of cancer therapy (FACT-G): Non-response to individual questions [J].
Fairclough, DL ;
Cella, DF .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1996, 5 (03) :321-329