Research governance: panacea or problem?

被引:5
作者
Samanta, A [1 ]
Samanta, J
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester Royal Infirm, Dept Rheumatol, Leicester LE1 5WW, Leics, England
[2] De Montfort Univ, Leicester LE1 9BH, Leics, England
关键词
Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (COREC); European Union Clinical Trials Directive; implications for NHS research; medical research; NHS research; research; research governance;
D O I
10.7861/clinmedicine.5-3-235
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Clinical research must meet contemporary professional, legal and ethical standards. Research governance aims to improve quality whilst safeguarding the interests of the public. Research on humans is covered by several internationally recognised ethical codes designed to protect persons from the hazards of experimental treatment. However, to date there is no over-arching statutory framework that regulates health and social care research, which is governed by common law principles. The recent European Union Clinical Trials Directive aims to harmonise regulation of clinical trials and protect the interest of study participants. Approval by the new Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (COREC) is now a mandatory requirement for research projects in the UK to ensure stringent ethical standards. Research that involves NHS patients, staff, resources or premises is subject to a framework for research governance that monitors performance and adverse incidents and delineates lines of responsibility and accountability. Researchers at all levels must be fully aware of these new initiatives and of their responsibilities. NHS organisations should acknowledge and commit to clinical research as an intrinsic component of high quality health service delivery.
引用
收藏
页码:235 / 239
页数:5
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], LAW MED ETHICS
[2]  
*CENT OFF RES ETH, 2004, ETH GOV REG STUD PRO
[3]  
Dyer C, 1997, BRIT MED J, V315, P205
[4]  
Ferguson Pamela R, 2003, Med Law Rev, V11, P48, DOI 10.1093/medlaw/11.1.48
[5]   Consultant suspended for research fraud [J].
Ferriman, A .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 321 (7274) :1429-1429
[6]  
*GEN MED COUNC, 2002, RES ROL RESP DOCT FE
[7]   Ethics review roulette: what can we learn? That ethics review has costs and one size doesn't fit all [J].
Glasziou, P ;
Chalmers, I .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7432) :121-122
[8]   Implementing clinical governance: turning vision into reality [J].
Halligan, A ;
Donaldson, L .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 322 (7299) :1413-1417
[9]   Investigating allegations of research misconduct: the vital need for due process [J].
Hey, E ;
Chalmers, I .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 321 (7263) :752-755
[10]   Research ethics paperwork: what is the plot we seem to have lost? [J].
Jamrozik, K .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 329 (7460) :286-287