Prioritizing investment in residential energy efficiency and renewable energy-A case study for the US Midwest

被引:32
作者
Brecha, R. J. [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Mitchell, A. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Hallinan, K. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Kissock, K. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dayton, Dept Phys, Dayton, OH 45469 USA
[2] Univ Dayton, Sustainabil Energy & Environm Initiat, Dayton, OH 45469 USA
[3] Univ Dayton, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Dayton, OH 45469 USA
[4] Univ Dayton, Bldg Energy Ctr, Dayton, OH 45469 USA
[5] Univ Dayton, Renewable & Clean Energy Program, Dayton, OH 45469 USA
关键词
Energy efficiency; Residential buildings; Greenhouse gas emissions; SECTOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.011
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Residential building energy use is an important contributor to greenhouse gas emissions and in the United States represents about 20% of total energy consumption. A number of previous macro-scale studies of residential energy consumption and energy-efficiency improvements are mainly concerned with national or international aggregate potential savings. In this paper we look into the details of how a collection of specific homes in one region might reduce energy consumption and carbon emissions, with particular attention given to some practical limits to what can be achieved by upgrading the existing residential building stock. Using a simple model of residential, single-family home construction characteristics, estimates are made for the efficacy of (i) changes to behavioral patterns that do not involve building shell modifications; (ii) straightforward air-infiltration mitigation measures, and (iii) insulation measures. We derive estimates of net lifetime savings resulting from these measures, in terms of energy, carbon emissions and dollars. This study points out explicitly the importance of local and regional patterns in decision-making about what fraction of necessary regional or national emissions reduction might be accomplished through energy-efficiency measures and how much might need to concentrate more heavily on renewable or other carbon-free sources of energy. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2982 / 2992
页数:11
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Jevons' paradox [J].
Alcott, B .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 54 (01) :9-21
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, WORLD ENERGY OUTLOOK
[3]  
[Anonymous], BUILD EN DAT BOOK
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, EFFECTS CLIMATE CHAN
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, ANN EN OUTL 2010
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2009, ANN EN REV
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2009, World Energy Outlook 2009
[8]  
Cleetus R., 2009, CLIMATE 2030 NATL BL
[9]   Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions [J].
Dietz, Thomas ;
Gardner, Gerald T. ;
Gilligan, Jonathan ;
Stern, Paul C. ;
Vandenbergh, Michael P. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2009, 106 (44) :18452-18456
[10]  
EIA, 2010, STAT EN DAT SYST