Prospective comparison of fast SE and GRASE sequences and echo planar imaging with conventional SE sequences in the detection of focal liver lesions at 1.0 T

被引:16
作者
Jung, G
Krahe, T
Kugel, H
Gieseke, J
Hahn, U
Walter, C
Lackner, K
机构
[1] UNIV COLOGNE,DEPT SURG,D-50924 COLOGNE,GERMANY
[2] PHILIPS MED SYST,COLOGNE,GERMANY
关键词
liver; neoplasms; magnetic resonance imaging; pulse sequences; techniques;
D O I
10.1097/00004728-199705000-00002
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Our goal was to investigate the value of T2-weighted fast SE (FSE) sequences, FSE sequences with shortened echo spacing (UFSE), combined gradient and spin echo sequences (GRASE), and segmented T1-weighted echo planar imaging (EPI) in comparison with conventional SE sequences in the detection of focal liver lesions. Method: Thirty-five patients with malignant focal liver lesions underwent MRI at 1.0 T. Results: All fast T2-weighted imaging techniques (FSE, UFSE, GRASE) showed fewer artifacts and overall better image quality than the conventional SE sequence. Quantitative analysis demonstrated that UFSE imaging had the highest tumor/liver contrast/noise ratio (C/N) (13.9 +/- 5.5) followed by FSE (12.7 +/- 4.5), T2 SE (10.9 +/- 4.2), and GRASE (10.0 +/- 4.8) sequences. The differences in C/N between the UFSE and T2 SE sequences was statistically significant (p < 0.05). C/N was significantly higher (p < 0.01) for the T1 SE (-7.4 +/- 3.8) than for the EPI sequence (-0.5 +/- 5.6). Conclusion: FSE sequences with shortened echo spacing are valuable for liver imaging at 1.0 T. In comparison with the T2 SE sequence, they yielded better image quality and comparable tumor/liver C/N.
引用
收藏
页码:341 / 347
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   ECHO-PLANAR IMAGING OF THE LIVER WITH A STANDARD MR-IMAGING SYSTEM [J].
BUTTS, K ;
RIEDERER, SJ ;
EHMAN, RL ;
FELMLEE, JP ;
GRIMM, RC .
RADIOLOGY, 1993, 189 (01) :259-264
[2]   T2-WEIGHTED MR-IMAGING OF THE ABDOMEN - FAST SPIN-ECHO VS CONVENTIONAL SPIN-ECHO SEQUENCES [J].
CATASCA, JV ;
MIROWITZ, SA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1994, 162 (01) :61-67
[3]   GRASE (GRADIENT-ECHO AND SPIN-ECHO) MR IMAGING - A NEW FAST CLINICAL IMAGING TECHNIQUE [J].
FEINBERG, DA ;
OSHIO, K .
RADIOLOGY, 1991, 181 (02) :597-602
[4]   DETECTION OF FOCAL HEPATIC MASSES - PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION WITH CT, DELAYED CT, CT DURING ARTERIAL PORTOGRAPHY, AND MR IMAGING [J].
HEIKEN, JP ;
WEYMAN, PJ ;
LEE, JKT ;
BALFE, DM ;
PICUS, D ;
BRUNT, EM ;
FLYE, MW .
RADIOLOGY, 1989, 171 (01) :47-51
[5]  
KREFT B, 1994, ROFO FORTSCHR RONTG, V161, P512
[6]   ABDOMINAL MR IMAGING - COMPARISON OF T2-WEIGHTED FAST AND CONVENTIONAL SPIN-ECHO, AND CONTRAST-ENHANCED FAST MULTIPLANAR SPOILED GRADIENT-RECALLED IMAGING [J].
LOW, RN ;
FRANCIS, IR ;
SIGETI, JS ;
FOO, TKF .
RADIOLOGY, 1993, 186 (03) :803-811
[7]   HEPATIC-TUMORS - COMPARISON OF CT DURING ARTERIAL PORTOGRAPHY, DELAYED CT, AND MR IMAGING FOR PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION [J].
NELSON, RC ;
CHEZMAR, JL ;
SUGARBAKER, PH ;
BERNARDINO, ME .
RADIOLOGY, 1989, 172 (01) :27-34
[8]   ABDOMINAL MR-IMAGING - EVALUATION OF A FAST SPIN-ECHO SEQUENCE [J].
OUTWATER, EK ;
MITCHELL, DG ;
VINITSKI, S .
RADIOLOGY, 1994, 190 (02) :425-429
[9]   LIVER METASTASES - DETECTION WITH MR IMAGING AT 0.5 AND 1.5T [J].
REINIG, JW ;
DWYER, AJ ;
MILLER, DL ;
FRANK, JA ;
ADAMS, GW ;
CHANG, AE .
RADIOLOGY, 1989, 170 (01) :149-153
[10]   LIVER METASTASIS DETECTION - COMPARATIVE SENSITIVITIES OF MR IMAGING AND CT SCANNING [J].
REINIG, JW ;
DWYER, AJ ;
MILLER, DL ;
WHITE, M ;
FRANK, JA ;
SUGARBAKER, PH ;
CHANG, AE ;
DOPPMAN, JL .
RADIOLOGY, 1987, 162 (01) :43-47