Anatomy of an error: ERP and fMRI

被引:248
作者
Mathalon, DH [1 ]
Whitfield, SL
Ford, JM
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Vet Affairs Connecticut Healthcare Syst, Psychiat Serv, West Haven, CT 06516 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Dept Psychol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[5] Vet Affairs Palo Alto Hlth Care Syst, Psychiat Serv, Palo Alto, CA USA
关键词
errors; NoGo task; response conflict; response monitoring; ERPs; fMRI; conflict; ERN; N2;
D O I
10.1016/S0301-0511(03)00105-4
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Successful inhibition of pre-potent responses involves conflict; failed inhibition involves both conflict and errors, complicating the study of errors. Event-related potential (ERP) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data were collected while ten subjects (26-55 years old) performed a Go/NoGo task, with pre-potent responses (88% Go) and inhibition of responses (12% NoGo). We measured error-related negativity (ERN) to false alarms (FA), correct-related negativity (CRN) to hits, NoGo N2 to correct rejections (CR) and Go N2 to hits. ERP difference scores were derived (ERN-CRN; NoGoN2-GoN2) for correlating with fMRI contrasts (FA-hits; CR-hits). Age effects were removed from ERN and N2 difference scores, and conflict effects, reflected in N2 difference scores, were removed from ERN. The resulting ERN correlated with fMRI activations in both caudal and rostral anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), while N2 correlated with fMRI activations in caudal ACC and in executive control regions including dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Thus, error and conflict monitoring may be dissociable, subserved by both overlapping and distinct ACC regions. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 141
页数:23
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Neurophysiological evidence of error-monitoring deficits in patients with schizophrenia [J].
Alain, C ;
McNeely, HE ;
He, Y ;
Christensen, BK ;
West, R .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2002, 12 (08) :840-846
[2]  
ARNSTEN AFT, 1995, J NEUROSCI, V15, P3429
[3]   Mapping the cingulate cortex in response selection and monitoring [J].
Badgaiyan, RD ;
Posner, MI .
NEUROIMAGE, 1998, 7 (03) :255-260
[4]   Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex [J].
Botvinick, M ;
Nystrom, LE ;
Fissell, K ;
Carter, CS ;
Cohen, JD .
NATURE, 1999, 402 (6758) :179-181
[5]   Conflict monitoring and cognitive control [J].
Botvinick, MM ;
Braver, TS ;
Barch, DM ;
Carter, CS ;
Cohen, JD .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2001, 108 (03) :624-652
[6]   Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: Effects of frequency, inhibition and errors [J].
Braver, TS ;
Barch, DM ;
Gray, JR ;
Molfese, DL ;
Snyder, A .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2001, 11 (09) :825-836
[7]   Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex [J].
Bush, G ;
Luu, P ;
Posner, MI .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2000, 4 (06) :215-222
[8]   Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance [J].
Carter, CS ;
Braver, TS ;
Barch, DM ;
Botvinick, MM ;
Noll, D ;
Cohen, JD .
SCIENCE, 1998, 280 (5364) :747-749
[9]   Anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex: who's in control? [J].
Cohen, JD ;
Botvinick, M ;
Carter, CS .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 3 (05) :421-423
[10]   LOCALIZATION OF A NEURAL SYSTEM FOR ERROR-DETECTION AND COMPENSATION [J].
DEHAENE, S ;
POSNER, MI ;
TUCKER, DM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1994, 5 (05) :303-305