Undamming rivers: A review of the ecological impacts of dam removal

被引:475
作者
Bednarek, AT [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Biol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Acad Nat Sci Philadelphia, Patrick Ctr Environm Res, Philadelphia, PA 19103 USA
关键词
dam removal; restoration; mitigation; flow regime; sediment; fish passage;
D O I
10.1007/s002670010189
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Dam removal continues to garner attention as a potential river restoration tool. The increasing possibility of dam removal through the FERC relicensing process, as well as through federal and state agency actions, makes a critical examination of the ecological benefits and costs essential. This paper reviews the possible ecological impacts of dam removal using various case studies. Restoration of an unregulated flow regime has resulted in increased biotic diversity through the enhancement of preferred spawning grounds or other habitat. By returning riverine conditions and sediment transport to formerly impounded areas, riffle/pool sequences, gravel, and cobble have reappeared, along with increases in biotic diversity. Fish passage has been another benefit of dam removal. However, the disappearance of the reservoir may also affect certain publicly desirable fisheries. Short-term ecological impacts of dam removal include an increased sediment load that may cause suffocation and abrasion to various biota and habitats. However, several recorded dam removals have suggested that the increased sediment load caused by removal should be a short-term effect. Pre-removal studies for contaminated sediment may be effective at controlling toxic release problems. Although monitoring and dam removal studies are limited, a continued examination of the possible ecological impacts is important for quantifying the resistance and resilience of aquatic ecosystems. Dam removal, although controversial, is an important alternative for river restoration.
引用
收藏
页码:803 / 814
页数:12
相关论文
共 96 条
[1]  
*AM RIV FRIENDS EA, 1999, DAM REM SUSS STOR RE
[2]  
*AM RIV NPS RIV TR, 1996, RIV REN REST RIV HYD
[3]  
ARNOULD M, 1997, WORLD RIVERS REV, V12, P10
[4]  
ASCE (American Society of Civil Engineers Task Committee on Guidelines for Retirement of Dams and Hydroelectric Facilities ofthe Hydropower Committee of the Energy Division), 1997, GUID RET DAMS HYDR F
[5]  
Auer NA, 1996, T AM FISH SOC, V125, P66, DOI 10.1577/1548-8659(1996)125<0066:ROSLST>2.3.CO
[6]  
2
[7]  
BOGAN AE, 1993, AM ZOOL, V33, P599
[8]   Socioeconomic and institutional dimensions of dam removals: The Wisconsin experience [J].
Born, SM ;
Genskow, KD ;
Filbert, TL ;
Hernandez-Mora, N ;
Keefer, ML ;
White, KA .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1998, 22 (03) :359-370
[9]  
BORN SM, 1996, 8961 U WISC MAD EXT
[10]   Biotic and abiotic changes along the recovery gradient of two impounded rivers with different impoundment use [J].
Camargo, JA ;
Voelz, NJ .
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 1998, 50 (02) :143-158