Addressing longitudinal connectivity in the systematic conservation planning of fresh waters

被引:157
作者
Hermoso, V. [1 ,2 ]
Linke, S. [1 ]
Prenda, J. [2 ]
Possingham, H. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Ctr Ecol, Sch Integrat Biol, St Lucia, Qld 4067, Australia
[2] Univ Huelva, Dept Biol Ambiental & Salud Publ, Huelva, Spain
关键词
biodiversity; irreplaceability; MARS-GLM; Marxan; Mediterranean; native fish species; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; FISH CONSERVATION; RESERVE NETWORKS; PROTECTED AREAS; PRIORITY AREAS; PERSISTENCE; DIVERSITY; SELECTION; STREAMS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02390.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
P>1. Freshwater conservation has received less attention than its terrestrial or marine counterparts. Given the accelerated rate of change and intensive human use that freshwater ecosystems are submitted to, it is urgent to focus more attention on fresh waters. Existing conservation planning tools - such as Marxan - need to be modified to account for the special nature of these systems. Connectivity plays a key role in freshwater ecosystems. Threats are mediated along river corridors, and the condition of the entire catchment influences river biodiversity downstream. This needs to be considered in conservation planning. 2. The probabilities of occurrence of nine native freshwater fish species in a Mediterranean river basin, obtained from Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines- Generalized Linear Model (MARS-GLM) models, were used as features to develop spatial conservation priorities. The priorities accounted for complementarity and spatial design issues. 3. To deal with the connected nature of rivers, we modified Marxan's boundary length penalty, avoiding the selection of isolated planning units and forcing the inclusion of closer upstream areas. We introduced 'virtual boundaries' between non-headwater stream segments and added distance-weighted penalties to the overall connectivity cost (CP) when stream segments upstream of the selected planning units are not selected. 4. This approach to prioritising connectivity is concordant with ecological theory, as it considers the natural and roughly exponential decay of upstream influences with distance. It accounts for the natural capacity of rivers to mitigate impacts when designing reserves. When connectivity was not emphasised, Marxan prioritised natural corridors for longitudinal movements. In contrast, whole sub-basins were prioritised when connectivity was emphasised. Changing the relative emphasis on connectivity substantially changed the spatial prioritisation; our conservation investment could move from one basin to another. 5. Our novel approach to dealing with directional connectivity enables managers of freshwater systems to set ecologically meaningful spatial conservation priorities.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 70
页数:14
相关论文
共 75 条
[51]   Optimality in reserve selection algorithms: When does it matter and how much? [J].
Pressey, RL ;
Possingham, HP ;
Margules, CR .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1996, 76 (03) :259-267
[52]   BEYOND OPPORTUNISM - KEY PRINCIPLES FOR SYSTEMATIC RESERVE SELECTION [J].
PRESSEY, RL ;
HUMPHRIES, CJ ;
MARGULES, CR ;
VANEWRIGHT, RI ;
WILLIAMS, PH .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1993, 8 (04) :124-128
[53]   Using abiotic data for conservation assessments over extensive regions: quantitative methods applied across New South Wales, Australia [J].
Pressey, RL ;
Hager, TC ;
Ryan, KM ;
Schwarz, J ;
Wall, S ;
Ferrier, S ;
Creaser, PM .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2000, 96 (01) :55-82
[54]   THE COST OF AD HOC RESERVATION - A CASE-STUDY IN WESTERN NEW-SOUTH-WALES [J].
PRESSEY, RL ;
TULLY, SL .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 1994, 19 (04) :375-384
[55]   Is maximizing protection the same as minimizing loss? Efficiency and retention as alternative measures of the effectiveness of proposed reserves [J].
Pressey, RL ;
Watts, ME ;
Barrett, TW .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2004, 7 (11) :1035-1046
[56]   Effectiveness of alternative heuristic algorithms for identifying indicative minimum requirements for conservation reserves [J].
Pressey, RL ;
Possingham, HP ;
Day, JR .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1997, 80 (02) :207-219
[58]   EFFICIENCY IN CONSERVATION EVALUATION - SCORING VERSUS ITERATIVE APPROACHES [J].
PRESSEY, RL ;
NICHOLLS, AO .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1989, 50 (1-4) :199-218
[59]   Conservation planning in a changing world [J].
Pressey, Robert L. ;
Cabeza, Mar ;
Watts, Matthew E. ;
Cowling, Richard M. ;
Wilson, Kerrie A. .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2007, 22 (11) :583-592
[60]  
Pringle CM, 2001, ECOL APPL, V11, P981, DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[0981:HCATMO]2.0.CO