Correlation of patient weight and cross-sectional dimensions with subjective image quality at standard dose abdominal CT

被引:30
作者
Kalra, MK
Maher, MM
Prasad, SR
Hayat, MS
Blake, MA
Varghese, J
Halpern, EF
Saini, S
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
computed tomography (CT);
D O I
10.3348/kjr.2003.4.4.234
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: We evaluated the association between patients' weight and abdominal cross-sectional dimensions and CT image quality. Materials and Methods: We prospectively evaluated 39 cancer patients aged more than 65 years with multislice CT scan of abdomen. All patients underwent equilibrium phase contrast-enhanced abdominal CT with 4 slices (from top of the right kidney) obtained at standard tube current (240-280 mA). All other scanning parameters were held constant. Patients' weight was measured just prior to the study. Cross-sectional abdominal dimensions such as circumference, area, average anterior abdominal wall fat thickness and, anteroposterior and transverse diameters were measured in all patients. Two subspecialty radiologists reviewed randomized images for overall image quality of abdominal structures using 5-point scale. Non-parametric correlation analysis was performed to determine the association of image quality with patients' weight and cross-sectional abdominal dimensions. Results: A statistically significant negative linear correlation of 0.46, 0.47, 0.47, 0.58, 0.56, 0.54, and 0.56 between patient weight, anterior abdominal fat thickness, anteroposterior and transverse diameter, circumference, cross-sectional area and image quality at standard scanning parameters was found (p<0.01). Conclusion: There is a significant association between image quality, patients' weight and cross-sectional abdominal dimensions. Maximum transverse diameter of the abdomen has the strongest association with subjective image quality.
引用
收藏
页码:234 / 238
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT [J].
Brenner, DJ ;
Elliston, CD ;
Hall, EJ ;
Berdon, WE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 176 (02) :289-296
[2]  
Cohnen M, 2000, AM J NEURORADIOL, V21, P1654
[3]   Unenhanced helical CT using increased pitch for suspected renal colic: An effective technique for radiation dose reduction? [J].
Diel, J ;
Perlmutter, S ;
Venkataramanan, N ;
Mueller, R ;
Lane, MJ ;
Katz, DS .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2000, 24 (05) :795-801
[4]   Minimizing radiation dose for pediatric body applications of single-detector helical CT: Strategies at a large children's hospital [J].
Donnelly, LF ;
Emery, KH ;
Brody, AS ;
Laor, T ;
Gylys-Morin, VM ;
Anton, CG ;
Thomas, SR ;
Frush, DP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 176 (02) :303-306
[5]   THE EFFECT OF MAS VARIATION UPON COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY IMAGE QUALITY AS EVALUATED BY INVIVO AND INVITRO STUDIES [J].
HAAGA, JR ;
MIRALDI, F ;
MACINTYRE, W ;
LIPUMA, JP ;
BRYAN, PJ ;
WIESEN, E .
RADIOLOGY, 1981, 138 (02) :449-454
[6]   Radiation dose management: Weighing risk versus benefit [J].
Haaga, JR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 177 (02) :289-291
[7]   WAIST CIRCUMFERENCE ACTION LEVELS IN THE IDENTIFICATION OF CARDIOVASCULAR RISK-FACTORS - PREVALENCE STUDY IN A RANDOM SAMPLE [J].
HAN, TS ;
VANLEER, EM ;
SEIDELL, JC ;
LEAN, MEJ .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 311 (7017) :1401-1405
[8]   Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. II. Phantom measurements [J].
Kalender, WA ;
Wolf, H ;
Suess, C .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (11) :2248-2253
[9]   Can noise reduction filters improve low-radiation-dose chest CT images? Pilot study [J].
Kalra, MK ;
Wittram, C ;
Maher, MM ;
Sharma, A ;
Avinash, GB ;
Karau, K ;
Toth, TL ;
Halpern, E ;
Saini, S ;
Shepard, JA .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 228 (01) :257-264
[10]   Low-dose CT of the abdomen: Evaluation of image improvement with use of noise reduction filters - Pilot study [J].
Kalra, MK ;
Maher, MM ;
Sahani, DV ;
Blake, MA ;
Hahn, PF ;
Avinash, GB ;
Toth, TL ;
Halpern, E ;
Saini, S .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 228 (01) :251-256