On the protection of "protected areas"

被引:365
作者
Joppa, Lucas N. [1 ]
Loarie, Scott R. [1 ]
Pimm, Stuart L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Nicholas Sch Environm & Earth Sci, Durham, NC 27708 USA
关键词
biodiversity; tropical forest; conservation; deforestation;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.0802471105
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Tropical moist forests contain the majority of terrestrial species. Human actions destroy between 1 and 2 million km(2) of such forests per decade, with concomitant carbon release into the atmosphere. Within these forests, protected areas are the principle defense against forest loss and species extinctions. Four regions-the Amazon, Congo, South American Atlantic Coast, and West Africa-once constituted about half the world's tropical moist forest. We measure forest cover at progressively larger distances inside and outside of protected areas within these four regions, using data-sets on protected areas and land-cover. We find important geographical differences. In the Amazon and Congo, protected areas are generally large and retain high levels of forest cover, as do their surroundings. These areas are protected de facto by being inaccessible and will likely remain protected if they continue to be so. Deciding whether they are also protected de jure - that is, whether effective laws also protect them-is statistically difficult, for there are few controls. In contrast, protected areas in the Atlantic Coast forest and West Africa show sharp boundaries in forest cover at their edges. This effective protection of forest cover is partially offset by their very small size: little area is deep inside protected area boundaries. Lands outside protected areas in the Atlantic Coast forest are unusually fragmented. Finally, we ask whether global databases on protected areas are biased toward highly protected areas and ignore "paper parks." Analysis of a Brazilian database does not support this presumption.
引用
收藏
页码:6673 / 6678
页数:6
相关论文
共 51 条
[11]   Money for nothing? A call for empirical evaluation of biodiversity conservation investments [J].
Ferraro, PJ ;
Pattanayak, SK .
PLOS BIOLOGY, 2006, 4 (04) :482-488
[12]   Rates of species loss from Amazonian forest fragments [J].
Ferraz, G ;
Russell, GJ ;
Stouffer, PC ;
Bierregaard, RO ;
Pimm, SL ;
Lovejoy, TE .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2003, 100 (24) :14069-14073
[13]   Loss of forest cover in Kalimantan, Indonesia, since the 1997-1998 El Nino [J].
Fuller, DO ;
Jessup, TC ;
Salim, A .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2004, 18 (01) :249-254
[14]   Ecological mechanisms linking protected areas to surrounding lands [J].
Hansen, Andrew J. ;
DeFries, Ruth .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2007, 17 (04) :974-988
[15]  
Hockings M, 2003, BIOSCIENCE, V53, P823, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0823:SFATEO]2.0.CO
[16]  
2
[17]   The future of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon [J].
Kirby, KR ;
Laurance, WF ;
Albernaz, AK ;
Schroth, G ;
Fearnside, PM ;
Bergen, S ;
Venticinque, EM ;
da Costa, C .
FUTURES, 2006, 38 (04) :432-453
[18]   Challenges for forest conservation in Gabon, central Africa [J].
Laurance, WF ;
Alonso, A ;
Lee, M ;
Campbell, P .
FUTURES, 2006, 38 (04) :454-470
[19]   When bigger is better: the need for Amazonian mega-reserves [J].
Laurance, WF .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2005, 20 (12) :645-648
[20]  
Laurance WF, 2004, SCIENCE, V304, P1109, DOI 10.1126/science.304.5674.1109b