The evolution of ideas in global climate policy

被引:119
作者
Meckling, Jonas [1 ]
Allan, Bentley B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Environm Sci Policy & Management, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
GREEN ECONOMY; TRANSITION; RESOURCES;
D O I
10.1038/s41558-020-0739-7
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This analysis of global climate policy reports shows how economic ideas have shaped climate policy. The authors find a shift from neoclassical dominance to a more diversified discourse, which has expanded policy choices beyond market-based policies to include green innovation and industrial policy. From carbon pricing to green industrial policy, economic ideas have shaped climate policy. Drawing on a new dataset of policy reports, we show how economic ideas influenced climate policy advice by major international organizations, including the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development and the World Bank, from 1990 to 2017. In the 1990s, the neoclassical notion of weak complementarity between environmental protection and growth dominated debates on sustainable development. In the mid-2000s, economic thought on the environment diversified, as the idea of strong complementarity between environmental protection and growth emerged in the green growth discourse. Adaptations of Schumpeterian and Keynesian economics identified investment in energy innovation and infrastructure as drivers of growth. We thus identify a major transformation from a neoclassical paradigm to a diversified policy discourse, suggesting that climate policy has entered a postparadigmatic period. The diversification of ideas broadened policy advice from market-based policy to green industrial policy, including deployment subsidies and regulation.
引用
收藏
页码:434 / +
页数:11
相关论文
共 59 条
[41]  
*OECD, 2006, ANN REP 2006
[42]  
Pearce David., 1989, BLUEPRINT GREEN EC
[43]   EU climate policy after the crisis [J].
Skovgaard, Jakob .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2014, 23 (01) :1-17
[44]  
SOLOW RM, 1974, AM ECON REV, V64, P1
[45]  
STERN N, 2012, LIONEL ROBBINS MEMOR
[46]   Contemporary Discourses of Green Political Economy: A Q Method Analysis [J].
Stevenson, Hayley .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY & PLANNING, 2019, 21 (05) :533-548
[47]  
STRIPPLE J, 2014, NEW APPROACHES RATIO
[48]  
Thornberg R, 2014, The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis, P153, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781446282243.N11
[49]   Varieties of green capitalism: economy and environment in the wake of the global financial crisis [J].
Tienhaara, Kyla .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2014, 23 (02) :187-204
[50]  
*UNDP, 1992, 1991 UNDP ANN REP CH