A novel ligand-independent function of the estrogen receptor is essential for osteocyte and osteoblast mechanotransduction

被引:114
作者
Aguirre, J. Ignacio [1 ]
Plotkin, Lilian I. [1 ]
Gortazar, Arancha R. [1 ]
Millan, Marta Martin [1 ]
O'Brien, Charles A. [1 ]
Manolagas, Stavros C. [1 ]
Bellido, Teresita [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Cent Arkansas Vet Healthcare Syst, Ctr Osteoporosis & Metab Bone Dis, Div Endocrinol & Metab, Little Rock, AR 72202 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1074/jbc.M702231200
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 [生物化学与分子生物学]; 081704 [应用化学];
摘要
Bone senses and adapts to meet mechanical needs by means of an extensive mechanotransduction network comprising osteocytes ( former osteoblasts entrapped in mineral) and their cytoplasmic projections through which osteocytes communicate with osteoblasts and osteoclasts on the bone surface. Mechanical stimulation promotes osteocyte ( and osteoblast) survival by activating the extracellular signal-regulated kinases, ERKs. Estrogens have similar effects and, intriguingly, the adaptive response of bone to mechanical forces is defective in mice lacking estrogen receptor ( ER) alpha or ER beta. We report that ERKs are not activated by stretching in osteocytic and osteoblastic cells in which both ER alpha and ER beta have been knocked out or knocked down and this is reversed partially by transfection of either one of the two human ERs and fully by transfection of both receptors. ERK activation in response to stretching is also recovered by transfecting the ligand-binding domain ( E) of either receptor or an ER alpha mutant that does not bind estrogens. Furthermore, mechano-responsiveness is restored by transfecting the E alpha targeted to the plasma membrane, but not to the nucleus, whereas ER alpha mutants with impaired plasma membrane localization or binding to caveolin-1 fail to confer ERK activation in response to stretching. Lastly, the ER antagonist ICI 182,780 abrogates ERK activation and the anti-apoptotic effect of mechanical stimulation. We conclude that in addition to their role as ligand-dependent mediators of the effects of estrogens, the ERs participate in the transduction of mechanical forces into pro-survival signaling in bone cells, albeit in a ligand-independent manner.
引用
收藏
页码:25501 / 25508
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]
FUNCTION OF OSTEOCYTES IN BONE [J].
AARDEN, EM ;
BURGER, EH ;
NIJWEIDE, PJ .
JOURNAL OF CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY, 1994, 55 (03) :287-299
[2]
Palmitoylation-dependent estrogen receptor α membrane localization:: Regulation by 17β-estradiol [J].
Acconcia, F ;
Ascenzi, P ;
Bocedi, A ;
Spisni, E ;
Tomasi, V ;
Trentalance, A ;
Visca, P ;
Marino, M .
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL, 2005, 16 (01) :231-237
[3]
Does palmitoylation target estrogen receptors to plasma membrane caveolae? [J].
Acconcia, F ;
Bocedi, A ;
Ascenzi, P ;
Marino, M .
IUBMB LIFE, 2003, 55 (01) :33-35
[4]
Osteocyte apoptosis is induced by weightlessness in mice and precedes osteoclast recruitment and bone loss [J].
Aguirre, JI ;
Plotkin, LI ;
Stewart, SA ;
Weinstein, RS ;
Parfitt, AM ;
Manolagas, SC ;
Bellido, T .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2006, 21 (04) :605-615
[5]
Shear stress inhibits while disuse promotes osteocyte apoptosis [J].
Bakker, A ;
Klein-Nulend, J ;
Burger, E .
BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2004, 320 (04) :1163-1168
[6]
Receptor mechanisms of rapid extranuclear signalling initiated by steroid hormones [J].
Boonyaratanakornkit, V ;
Edwards, DP .
ESSAYS IN BIOCHEMISTRY: NUCLEAR RECEPTOR SUPERFAMILY, 2004, 40 :105-120
[7]
Boyce BF, 2002, PRINCIPLES BONE BIOL, V1, P151
[8]
Bruce Martin R., 1998, Skeletal Tissue Mechanics
[9]
Estrogen receptor α and endothelial nitric oxide synthase are organized into a functional signaling module in caveolae [J].
Chambliss, KL ;
Yuhanna, IS ;
Mineo, C ;
Liu, PS ;
German, Z ;
Sherman, TS ;
Mendelsohn, ME ;
Anderson, RGW ;
Shaul, PW .
CIRCULATION RESEARCH, 2000, 87 (11) :E44-E52
[10]
ERβ has nongenomic action in caveolae [J].
Chambliss, KL ;
Yuhanna, IS ;
Anderson, RGW ;
Mendelsohn, ME ;
Shaul, PW .
MOLECULAR ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2002, 16 (05) :938-946