Antihypertensive efficacy of olmesartan medoxomil and candesartan cilexetil assessed by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in patients with essential hypertension

被引:60
作者
Brunner, HR [1 ]
Stumpe, KO
Januszewicz, A
机构
[1] CHU Vaudois, Div Hypertens, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
[2] Univ Bonn, Med Poliklin, D-5300 Bonn, Germany
[3] Inst Cardiol, Dept Hypertens, Warsaw, Poland
关键词
D O I
10.2165/00044011-200323070-00001
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the antihypertensive efficacy of olmesartan medoxomil with that of candesartan cilexetil after 1, 2 and 8 weeks of treatment. Design and setting: Randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study conducted at 44 centres in Germany, Poland and the Czech Republic. Patients: 643 patients (aged 19-86 years) with mainly mild-to-moderate essential hypertension received active double-blind treatment. Interventions: Following a 2-week placebo run-in, eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive olmesartan medoxomil 20mg (n = 319) or candesartan cilexetil 8mg (n = 324) once daily for 8 weeks. Main outcome measures: Changes from baseline in daytime, 24-hour and night-time diastolic (DBP) and systolic (SBP) blood pressures assessed by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), and changes from baseline in sitting cuff DBP and SBP. Results: Mean decreases from baseline in daytime DBP by ABPM at weeks 1, 2 and 8 were 6.7, 8.4 and 9.3mm Hg, respectively, in the olmesartan medoxomil group compared with 5.3, 6.0 and 7.8mm Hg, respectively, in the candesartan cilexetil group. The between-group differences were significantly in favour of olmesartan medoxomil at all three timepoints (p less than or equal to 0.0126). Significant differences in favour of olmesartan medoxomil were also observed for mean 24-hour DBP and for mean daytime and 24-hour SBP by ABPM. Decreases from baseline in sitting cuff BP at trough were similar in the two groups (15-16mm Hg for DBP and 21mm Hg for SBP). Both treatments were well tolerated. Conclusions: Olmesartan medoxomil reduced daytime and 24-hour DBP and SBP, assessed by ABPM, more effectively than candesartan cilexetil at the doses tested. The majority of the treatment effect in both groups was seen after only 1 or 2 weeks of dosing, when the between-group differences were already statistically significant.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 430
页数:12
相关论文
共 34 条
[11]   Patient compliance in the treatment of arterial hypertension [J].
Mallion, JM ;
Schmitt, D .
JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2001, 19 (12) :2281-2283
[12]  
Mancia G, 1997, CIRCULATION, V95, P1464
[13]  
MANCIA G, 1989, AM J MED, V87, pS64
[14]   Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and organ damage [J].
Mancia, G ;
Parati, G .
HYPERTENSION, 2000, 36 (05) :894-900
[15]  
Mancia Giuseppe, 1996, Blood Pressure, V5, P36
[16]   Implementation of WHO/ISH guidelines: Role and activities of WHO [J].
Martin, I .
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HYPERTENSION, 1999, 21 (5-6) :659-669
[17]   Comparative safety and tolerability of angiotensin II receptor antagonists [J].
Mazzolai, L ;
Burnier, M .
DRUG SAFETY, 1999, 21 (01) :23-33
[18]   Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring [J].
McGrath, BP .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2002, 176 (12) :588-592
[19]  
Meredith PA, 1999, AM J CARDIOL, V84, p7K
[20]   Evidence-based health policy - Lessons from the global burden of disease study [J].
Murray, CJL ;
Lopez, AD .
SCIENCE, 1996, 274 (5288) :740-743