Greenhouse gas mitigation by agricultural intensification

被引:684
作者
Burney, Jennifer A. [1 ,2 ]
Davis, Steven J. [3 ]
Lobell, David B. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Program Food Secur & Environm, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Environm Earth Syst Sci, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Carnegie Inst Washington, Dept Global Ecol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
agriculture; greenhouse gas emissions; land use change; climate change mitigation; carbon price; NITROUS-OXIDE EMISSIONS; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; LAND-USE; PRODUCTIVITY; TILLAGE; IMPACT; GROWTH; FERTILIZER; YIELD; FLUX;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.0914216107
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
As efforts to mitigate climate change increase, there is a need to identify cost-effective ways to avoid emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs). Agriculture is rightly recognized as a source of considerable emissions, with concomitant opportunities for mitigation. Although future agricultural productivity is critical, as it will shape emissions from conversion of native landscapes to food and biofuel crops, investment in agricultural research is rarely mentioned as a mitigation strategy. Here we estimate the net effect on GHG emissions of historical agricultural intensification between 1961 and 2005. We find that while emissions from factors such as fertilizer production and application have increased, the net effect of higher yields has avoided emissions of up to 161 gigatons of carbon (GtC) (590 GtCO(2)e) since 1961. We estimate that each dollar invested in agricultural yields has resulted in 68 fewer kgC (249 kgCO(2)e) emissions relative to 1961 technology ($14.74/tC, or similar to$4/tCO(2)e), avoiding 3.6 GtC (13.1 GtCO(2)e) per year. Our analysis indicates that investment in yield improvements compares favorably with other commonly proposed mitigation strategies. Further yield improvements should therefore be prominent among efforts to reduce future GHG emissions.
引用
收藏
页码:12052 / 12057
页数:6
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] Agricultural Research, Productivity, and Food Prices in the Long Run
    Alston, Julian M.
    Beddow, Jason M.
    Pardey, Philip G.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2009, 325 (5945) : 1209 - 1210
  • [2] A review of nitrogen fertilizer and conservation tillage effects on soil organic carbon storage
    Alvarez, R
    [J]. SOIL USE AND MANAGEMENT, 2005, 21 (01) : 38 - 52
  • [3] Agricultural technology and forests: A recapitulation
    Angelsen, A
    Kaimowitz, D
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGIES AND TROPICAL DEFORESTATION, 2001, : 383 - 402
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2006, EPA 430-R-06-003
  • [5] Sparing land for nature: exploring the potential impact of changes in agricultural yield on the area needed for crop production
    Balmford, A
    Green, RE
    Scharlemann, JPW
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2005, 11 (10) : 1594 - 1605
  • [6] Barker T, 2007, AR4 CLIMATE CHANGE 2007: MITIGATION OF CLIMATE CHANGE, P619
  • [7] CONTRIBUTIONS OF CONVENTIONAL PLANT-BREEDING TO FOOD-PRODUCTION
    BORLAUG, NE
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1983, 219 (4585) : 689 - 693
  • [8] Contributions to accelerating atmospheric CO2 growth from economic activity, carbon intensity, and efficiency of natural sinks
    Canadell, Josep G.
    Le Quéré, Corinne
    Raupach, Michael R.
    Field, Christopher B.
    Buitenhuis, Erik T.
    Ciais, Philippe
    Conway, Thomas J.
    Gillett, Nathan P.
    Houghton, R. A.
    Marland, Gregg
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2007, 104 (47) : 18866 - 18870
  • [9] The contribution of manure and fertilizer nitrogen to atmospheric nitrous oxide since 1860
    Davidson, Eric A.
    [J]. NATURE GEOSCIENCE, 2009, 2 (09) : 659 - 662
  • [10] [Eggleston H.S. IPCC. IPCC.], 2006, The IPCC National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Programme