What We Know and Don't Know About Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review and Research Agenda

被引:2335
作者
Aguinis, Herman [1 ]
Glavas, Ante [2 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Dept Management & Entrepreneurship, Kelley Sch Business, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
[2] Univ Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
关键词
corporate social responsibility; sustainability; microfoundations of corporate social responsibility; corporate citizenship; corporate social performance; RESOURCE-BASED THEORY; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS; ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE; INSTITUTIONAL OWNERSHIP; SHAREHOLDER VALUE; JOB-PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; BUSINESS; STAKEHOLDER;
D O I
10.1177/0149206311436079
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The authors review the corporate social responsibility (CSR) literature based on 588 journal articles and 102 books and book chapters. They offer a multilevel and multidisciplinary theoretical framework that synthesizes and integrates the literature at the institutional, organizational, and individual levels of analysis. The framework includes reactive and proactive predictors of CSR actions and policies and the outcomes of such actions and policies, which they classify as primarily affecting internal (i.e., internal outcomes) or external (i.e., external outcomes) stakeholders. The framework includes variables that explain underlying mechanisms (i.e., relationship-and value-based mediator variables) of CSR-outcomes relationships and contingency effects (i.e., people-, place-, price-, and profile-based moderator variables) that explain conditions under which the relationship between CSR and its outcomes change. The authors' review reveals important knowledge gaps related to the adoption of different theoretical orientations by researchers studying CSR at different levels of analysis, the need to understand underlying mechanisms linking CSR with outcomes, the need for research at micro levels of analysis (i.e., individuals and teams), and the need for methodological approaches that will help address these substantive knowledge gaps. Accordingly, they offer a detailed research agenda for the future, based on a multilevel perspective that aims to integrate diverse theoretical frameworks as well as develop an understanding of underlying mechanisms and microfoundations of CSR (i.e., foundations based on individual action and interactions). The authors also provide specific suggestions regarding research design, measurement, and data-analytic approaches that will be instrumental in carrying out their proposed research agenda.
引用
收藏
页码:932 / 968
页数:37
相关论文
共 188 条
[31]   Organizational identity orientation: The genesis of the role of the firm and distinct forms of social value [J].
Brickson, Shelley L. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2007, 32 (03) :864-888
[32]   The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses [J].
Brown, TJ ;
Dacin, PA .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1997, 61 (01) :68-84
[33]  
BUEHLER VM, 1974, ACAD MANAGE J, V17, P767, DOI 10.5465/255653
[34]  
BUEHLER VM, 1976, ACAD MANAGE J, V19, P66, DOI 10.5465/255448
[35]  
Campbell JL, 2007, ACAD MANAGE REV, V32, P946, DOI 10.5465/AMR.2007.25275684
[36]   The role of perceived organizational performance in organizational identification, adjustment and job performance* [J].
Carmeli, Abraham ;
Gilat, Gershon ;
Waldman, David A. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2007, 44 (06) :972-992
[37]  
Carroll AB., 1999, Business Society, V38, P268, DOI [10.1177/000765039903800303, DOI 10.1177/000765039903800303]
[38]   The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research and Practice [J].
Carroll, Archie B. ;
Shabana, Kareem M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2010, 12 (01) :85-105
[39]  
Carroll ArchieB., 2008, OXFORD HDB CORPORATE, P19, DOI [10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199211593.003.0002, DOI 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199211593.003.0002]
[40]   HOW FIRMS RESPOND TO BEING RATED [J].
Chatterji, Aaron K. ;
Toffel, Michael W. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2010, 31 (09) :917-945