Antitrust in innovative industries

被引:99
作者
Segal, Ilya [1 ]
Whinston, Michael D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Econ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Dept Econ, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1257/aer.97.5.1703
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We study the effects of antitrust policy in industries with continual innovation. Antitrust policies that restrict incumbent behavior toward new entrants may have conflicting effects on innovation incentives, raising the profits of new entrants, but lowering those of continuing incumbents. We show that the direction of the net effect can be determined by analyzing shifts in innovation benefit and supply, holding the innovation rate fixed. We apply this framework to analyze several specific antitrust policies. We also show that, in some cases, the tension does not arise, and policies that protect entrants necessarily raise the rate of innovation.
引用
收藏
页码:1703 / 1730
页数:28
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Competition, imitation and growth with step-by-step innovation
    Aghion, P
    Harris, C
    Howitt, P
    Vickers, J
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2001, 68 (03) : 467 - 492
  • [2] A MODEL OF GROWTH THROUGH CREATIVE DESTRUCTION
    AGHION, P
    HOWITT, P
    [J]. ECONOMETRICA, 1992, 60 (02) : 323 - 351
  • [3] [Anonymous], INNOVATION POLICY EC
  • [4] FISHER FM, 2000, DID MICROSOFT HURT C, P1
  • [5] Fudenberg D, 2000, J IND ECON, V48, P373
  • [6] An economist's guide to US v. Microsoft
    Gilbert, RJ
    Katz, ML
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2001, 15 (02) : 25 - 44
  • [7] Gilbert RJ, 1995, ANTITRUST LJ, V63, P569
  • [8] QUALITY LADDERS IN THE THEORY OF GROWTH
    GROSSMAN, GM
    HELPMAN, E
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1991, 58 (01) : 43 - 61
  • [9] Rewarding sequential innovators: Prizes, patents, and buyouts
    Hopenhayn, Hugo
    Llobet, Gerard
    Mitchell, Matthew
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2006, 114 (06) : 1041 - 1068
  • [10] Patentability, industry structure, and innovation
    Hunt, RM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 52 (03) : 401 - 425