Familial invasive breast cancers:: Worse outcome related to BRCA1 mutations

被引:144
作者
Stoppa-Lyonnet, D
Ansquer, Y
Dreyfus, H
Gautier, C
Gauthier-Villars, M
Bourstyn, E
Clough, KB
Magdelénat, H
Pouillart, P
Vincent-Salomon, A
Fourquet, A
Asselain, B
机构
[1] Inst Curie, Dept Oncol Genet, Serv Genet Oncol, F-75248 Paris, France
[2] Inst Curie, Dept Biostat, F-75248 Paris, France
[3] Inst Curie, Dept Radiotherapy, F-75248 Paris, France
[4] Inst Curie, Dept Surg, F-75248 Paris, France
[5] Inst Curie, Dept Pharmacol, F-75248 Paris, France
[6] Inst Curie, Dept Med Oncol, F-75248 Paris, France
[7] Inst Curie, Dept Pathol, F-75248 Paris, France
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2000.18.24.4053
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Although all studies confirm that BRCA1 tumors are highly proliferative and poorly differentiated, their outcomes remain controversial. We propose to examine, through a cohort study, the pathologic characteristics, overall survival, local recurrence, and metastasis-free intervals of 40 patients with BRCA1 breast cancer. Patients and Methods: A cohort of 183 patients with invasive breast cancer, treated at the Institut Curie and presenting with a familial history of breast and/or ovarian cancer, were tested for BRCA1 germ-line mutation. Tumor characteristics and clinical events were extracted from our prospectively registered database. Results: Forty BRCA1 mutations were found among the 183 patients (22%). Median follow-up was 58 months. BRCA1 tumors were larger in size (P =.03), had a higher rate of grade 3 histoprognostic factors (P =,002), and had a higher frequency of negative estrogen (P =.003) and progesterone receptors (P =.002) compared with non-BRCA1 tumors. Overall survival was poorer for carriers than for noncarriers (5-year rate, 80% v 91%, P =.002), Because a long time interval between cancer diagnosis and genetic counseling artificially increases survival time due to unrecorded deaths, the analysis was limited to the 110 patients whose diagnosis-to-counseling interval war less than 36 months (19 BRCA1 patients and 91 non-BRCA1 patients), The differences between the BRCA1 and non-BRCA1 groups regarding overall survival and metastasis-free interval were dramatically increased (49% v 85% and 18% v 84%, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that BRCA1 mutation was an independent prognostic factor. Conclusion: Our results strongly support that among patients with familial breast cancer, those who have a BRCA1 mutation have a worse outcome than those who do not. J Clin Oncol 18:4053-4059. (C) 2000 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:4053 / 4059
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[11]  
2-W
[12]  
MANTEL NATHAN, 1966, CANCERCHEMOTHERAP REP, V50, P163
[13]  
Marcus JN, 1996, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V77, P697, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960215)77:4<697::AID-CNCR16>3.0.CO
[14]  
2-W
[15]   A STRONG CANDIDATE FOR THE BREAST AND OVARIAN-CANCER SUSCEPTIBILITY GENE BRCA1 [J].
MIKI, Y ;
SWENSEN, J ;
SHATTUCKEIDENS, D ;
FUTREAL, PA ;
HARSHMAN, K ;
TAVTIGIAN, S ;
LIU, QY ;
COCHRAN, C ;
BENNETT, LM ;
DING, W ;
BELL, R ;
ROSENTHAL, J ;
HUSSEY, C ;
TRAN, T ;
MCCLURE, M ;
FRYE, C ;
HATTIER, T ;
PHELPS, R ;
HAUGENSTRANO, A ;
KATCHER, H ;
YAKUMO, K ;
GHOLAMI, Z ;
SHAFFER, D ;
STONE, S ;
BAYER, S ;
WRAY, C ;
BOGDEN, R ;
DAYANANTH, P ;
WARD, J ;
TONIN, P ;
NAROD, S ;
BRISTOW, PK ;
NORRIS, FH ;
HELVERING, L ;
MORRISON, P ;
ROSTECK, P ;
LAI, M ;
BARRETT, JC ;
LEWIS, C ;
NEUHAUSEN, S ;
CANNONALBRIGHT, L ;
GOLDGAR, D ;
WISEMAN, R ;
KAMB, A ;
SKOLNICK, MH .
SCIENCE, 1994, 266 (5182) :66-71
[16]  
*NCI, 2000, SURV EP END RES
[17]  
Noguchi S, 1999, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V85, P2200, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990515)85:10<2200::AID-CNCR14>3.3.CO
[18]  
2-J
[19]   Breast carcinomas arising in carriers of mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2:: Are they prognostically different? [J].
Phillips, KA ;
Andrulis, IL ;
Goodwin, PJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (11) :3653-3663
[20]   BREAST-CANCER INCIDENCE, PENETRANCE AND SURVIVAL IN PROBABLE CARRIERS OF BRCA1 GENE MUTATION IN FAMILIES LINKED TO BRCA1 ON CHROMOSOME 17Q12-21 [J].
PORTER, DE ;
COHEN, BB ;
WALLACE, MR ;
SMYTH, E ;
CHETTY, U ;
DIXON, JM ;
STEEL, CM ;
CARTER, DC .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1994, 81 (10) :1512-1515