Generation Expansion Planning in the Age of Green Economy

被引:90
作者
Careri, Francesco [1 ]
Genesi, Camillo [1 ]
Marannino, Paolo [1 ]
Montagna, Mario [1 ]
Rossi, Stefano [1 ]
Siviero, Ilaria [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pavia, Dept Elect Engn, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
关键词
Generalized Benders decomposition; green economy incentives; power generation planning; DECOMPOSITION;
D O I
10.1109/TPWRS.2011.2107753
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Generation expansion planning (GEP) is the problem of finding the optimal strategy to plan the construction of new generation plants while satisfying technical and economical constraints. It is a challenging problem due to its nonlinearity, large-scale, and to the discrete nature of the variables describing unit size and allocation. Originally, GEP was faced by vertically integrated utilities with the aim of minimizing production and capital costs. After deregulation, generation companies were forced to consider GEP from the viewpoint of market shares and financial risk. In recent years, increasing concern for environmental protection has driven lots of countries all over the world to promote energy generation from renewable sources. Different incentive systems have been introduced to support the growth of the investments in generation plants exploiting renewable energy. In the present paper, the impact of some of the most popular incentive systems (namely feed-in tariffs, quota obligation, emission trade, and carbon tax) on generation planning is considered, thus obtaining a comprehensive GEP model with a suitably modified objective function and additional constraints. The resulting problem is solved by resorting to the generalized Benders decomposition (GBD) approach and implemented in the Matlab programming language. Tests are presented with reference to the Italian system.
引用
收藏
页码:2214 / 2223
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Bai H, 2006, WCICA 2006: SIXTH WORLD CONGRESS ON INTELLIGENT CONTROL AND AUTOMATION, VOLS 1-12, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, P7587
[2]   Partitioning procedures for solving mixed-variables programming problems [J].
Benders, J. F. .
COMPUTATIONAL MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2005, 2 (01) :3-19
[3]  
Blaesig B., 2007, P 2007 IEEE POW TECH
[4]   LONG-RANGE GENERATION PLANNING USING DECOMPOSITION AND PROBABILISTIC SIMULATION [J].
BLOOM, JA .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER APPARATUS AND SYSTEMS, 1982, 101 (04) :797-802
[5]   LONG-RANGE GENERATION PLANNING WITH LIMITED ENERGY AND STORAGE PLANTS .1. PRODUCTION COSTING [J].
BLOOM, JA ;
CHARNY, L .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER APPARATUS AND SYSTEMS, 1983, 102 (09) :2861-2870
[6]   OPTIMAL GENERATION PLANNING CONSIDERING UNCERTAINTY [J].
BOOTH, RR .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER APPARATUS AND SYSTEMS, 1972, PA91 (01) :70-&
[7]  
Chakrabarti S., 2009, Proc. of Third International Conference on Power Systems, P1
[8]   Power Generation Expansion Planning Model Towards Low-Carbon Economy and Its Application in China [J].
Chen, Qixin ;
Kang, Chongqing ;
Xia, Qing ;
Zhong, Jin .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2010, 25 (02) :1117-1125
[9]   A game-theoretic model for generation expansion planning: Problem formulation and numerical comparisons [J].
Chuang, AS ;
Wu, F ;
Varaiya, P .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2001, 16 (04) :885-891
[10]   Risk assessment in energy trading [J].
Dahgren, R ;
Liu, CC ;
Lawarrée, J .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2003, 18 (02) :503-511