Wind Power Electricity: The Bigger the Turbine, The Greener the Electricity?

被引:135
作者
Caduff, Marloes [1 ,2 ]
Huijbregts, Mark A. J. [3 ]
Althaus, Hans-Joerg [1 ]
Koehler, Annette [1 ]
Hellweg, Stefanie [1 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Environm Engn, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Empa, Swiss Fed Labs Mat Testing & Res, Technol & Soc Lab, CH-8600 Dubendorf, Switzerland
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Fac Sci, Inst Wetland & Water Res, Dept Environm Sci, NL-6500 GL Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; EXPERIENCE CURVES; COST REDUCTIONS; TECHNOLOGIES;
D O I
10.1021/es204108n
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Wind energy is a fast-growing and promising renewable energy source. The investment costs of wind turbines have decreased over the years, making wind energy economically competitive to conventionally produced electricity. Size scaling in the form of a power law, experience curves and progress rates are used to estimate the cost development of ever-larger turbines. In life cycle assessment, scaling and progress rates are seldom applied to estimate the environmental impacts of wind energy. This study quantifies whether the trend toward larger turbines affects the environmental profile of the generated electricity. Previously published life cycle inventories were combined with an engineering-based scaling approach as well as European wind power statistics. The results showed that the larger the turbine is, the greener the electricity becomes. This effect was caused by pure size effects of the turbine (micro level) as well as learning and experience with the technology over time (macro level). The environmental progress rate was 86%, indicating that for every cumulative production doubling, the global warming potential per kWh was reduced by 14%. The parameters, hub height and rotor diameter were identified as Environmental Key Performance Indicators that can be used to estimate the environmental impacts for a generic turbine.
引用
收藏
页码:4725 / 4733
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
[31]   Life-cycle assessment of a 2-MW rated power wind turbine: CML method [J].
Martinez, Eduardo ;
Sanz, Felix ;
Pellegrini, Stefano ;
Jimenez, Emilio ;
Blanco, Julio .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2009, 14 (01) :52-63
[32]  
Mathew S., 2006, Wind energy: fundamentals, resource analysis and economics, V1, DOI DOI 10.1007/3-540-30906-3
[33]  
Mathur J., 2000, RENEWABLE ENERGY REN
[34]  
Mcculloch M., 2000, Life-Cycle Value Assessment of a Wind Turbine
[35]   ECONOMIES OF SCALE - SOME STATISTICAL EVIDENCE [J].
MOORE, FT .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1959, 73 (02) :232-245
[36]  
Morthorst P.E., 2009, The Economics of Wind Energy
[37]   Cost development of future technologies for power generation - A study based on experience curves and complementary bottom-up assessments [J].
Neij, Lena .
ENERGY POLICY, 2008, 36 (06) :2200-2211
[38]   Beyond the learning curve: factors influencing cost reductions in photovoltaics [J].
Nemet, Gregory F. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2006, 34 (17) :3218-3232
[39]  
Nijssen R. P. L., 2001, EUR WIND EN C EXH EW
[40]  
PRe Consultants, 2009, SIMAPRO 7 1 8